Right to life and liberty so that would be B
Despite the North's greater population, however, the South had an army almost equal in size during the first year of the war. The North had an enormous industrial advantage as well. At the beginning of the war, the Confederacy had only one-ninth the industrial capacity of the Union. But that statistic was misleading
he Dunning School's interpretation not only shaped how historians viewed Reconstruction, but the public's view also. This can be clearly seen "with the many newspaper editorials written about it." (Option B)
<h3>
How did the Dunning School View Reconstructing?</h3>
He believed that Reconstruction had harmed the South and that the deployment of the US Army to regulate state politics had infringed on American principles.
He believed that freedmen had shown incapable of self-government, necessitating segregation.
Learn more about Reconstruction:
brainly.com/question/24761999
#SPJ1
Answer:
im pretty sure its c and a
Explanation:
Answer:
The took it for themselves kind of.
Explanation:
On Aug. 19, 1953, elements inside Iran organized and funded by the Central Intelligence Agency and British intelligence services carried out a coup d’état that overthrew the government of Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh. Historians have yet to reach a consensus on why the Eisenhower administration opted to use covert action in Iran, tending to either emphasize America’s fear of communism or its desire to control oil as the most important factor influencing the decision. Using recently declassified material, this article argues that growing fears of a “collapse” in Iran motivated the decision to remove Mossadegh. American policymakers believed that Iran could not survive without an agreement that would restart the flow of oil, something Mossadegh appeared unable to secure. There was widespread scepticism of his government’s ability to manage an “oil-less” economy, as well as fears that such a situation would lead inexorably to communist rule. A collapse narrative emerged to guide U.S. thinking, one that coalesced in early 1953 and convinced policymakers to adopt regime change as the only remaining option. Oil and communism both impacted the coup decision, but so did powerful notions of Iranian incapacity and a belief that only an intervention by the United States would save the country from a looming, though vaguely defined, calamity.
