Answer:
x=1
Step-by-step explanation:
4x-6= -2
+6=+6
<u>4x</u>=<u>4</u>
4 = 4
x= 1
Answer:
b. We have very strong evidence that the long-run average guess of the population size of Milwaukee, Wisconsin is smaller with the anchor of Green Bay than with the anchor of Chicago.
Step-by-step explanation:
Smaller p-value indicates a strong evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis which means we can reject the null hypothesis. In the given scenario the p-value is 0.0001 which is very small. There is sufficient evidence for the rejection of null hypothesis.
Answer:
middle graph
Step-by-step explanation:
Soluton
The second (middle ) graph is the only one that works.
- First of all when you simplicity the right, you get y = x^2 - 1). That means that x does not go through 0,0. If you put x = 0 into x^ - 1 = 0, you get - 1. So on that basis alone both the first and third graphs are incorrect.
- Second, both xs in the factors are plus, so x^2 is plus, which means the graph opens upward.
So, we know that it takes Sam 1 mph up and 9 mph down and it takes Liam both 2 mph down and up the hill. So if we divide the 2 mph for Liam by 2 miles (the whole length of the hill) we will get 1 or 1 hour. Then we do 1/1 (i don't know how to explain this part of why we do that, sorry) and than we do 1 / 9 and we get 1/9 so we add them and get 1 1/9 so that's Sam's time.
So, Liam took one hour and Sam took 1 and 1/9 hours, in conclusion liam was faster
<h2> (I'm really sorry for my bad explaining, i tried my best)</h2>
