1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anna007 [38]
3 years ago
14

which characteristic of the government under the roman republic had the greatest impact on the democratic tradition?

History
1 answer:
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
4 0
Republic was the form of government that developed under the Roman Republic and it had <span>the greatest impact on the democratic tradition. It is basically a type of indirect democracy in which the people had the right to chooses the people who had the power of making government decisions. I hope it helps you.</span>
You might be interested in
Where does the word philosophy come from
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
The original meaning of the word philosophy comes froms the greek roots philo meaning "Love" and sophos, or "Wisdom".
6 0
3 years ago
Who were the people who helped open the west?
Sliva [168]
They're Were Several People
<span>The Explorers
</span>The Mountain Men
The Californios
The Missionaries
The Pioneer Women
The Mormons
The Forty-Niners
The Chinese
5 0
3 years ago
The party ______ actively recruit candidates for office and try to influence who wins the primary election.
baherus [9]
<span>This is the party organization. While they may not have influence on the general election, they can make sure that the candidate that best represents the party's ideals is slated for that election. By having primary elections and backing a preferred candidate, the organization can show voters what is most important for a governing agenda in the eyes of the party.</span>
5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following best states Alexander Hamilton’s attitude toward the conflict between Great Britain and France?
Evgen [1.6K]

Answer:

He favored neutrality, refusing to support either side.

7 0
3 years ago
what is the difference between a kid being emancipated and a slave being emancipated?? how does it differ from the times of slav
damaskus [11]

The difference is quite simple, a child under the care of his parents is not a slave, or at least he is not supposed to be. A slave is a human being forced into involuntary and total servitude for the entirety of his life. A child is only under the authority of his parents until he turns 18. As of 18 years of age he/she is considered an adult and can do as he/she pleases with his own life. It needs to be remarked that authority is not the same as forced involuntary servitude (though some kids might be inclined to use such term when asked to collaborate with reasonable house chores but that is just plain hyperbolic immaturity). The emancipation of an actual slave by a slave owner is seldom voluntary and most times it is forced (it took a Civil War to settle the question). The emancipation of a kid takes place for very different reasons:

- The parents are found to neglect the well-being of the child (exploitation, sexual abuse, violent physical or psychological abuse, etc). The child is then emancipated, that is to say removed from his parent’s care and either becomes a ward of the State or the adopted son or daughter of another family).

- The child has left school at age 16 and starts working and earning his/her own salary and achieves financial independence from his /her parents. He/she marries or enters the army.

It is evident that the only similarity between the emancipation of a child and the emancipation of a slave is the use of the same word that has the same etymological source but very different meanings.

Between the times of actual slavery and now. Things have changed quite a bit. There was no legal framework for the emancipation of children, let alone laws preventing their neglect by parents. Emancipation of slaves occurred a long time before the emancipation of children was established in the 20th century. It did take place de facto before that but there was no legal framework.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What event marked the end of fighting during World War 1​
    13·2 answers
  • In what way did the Antifederalists criticize the Constitution?
    6·2 answers
  • which of the following does not accurately describe what happened after the founding about people's republic of china in 1949
    13·1 answer
  • Who is JJ Olatunji most comonly known as?
    15·2 answers
  • Put in order of events:
    10·1 answer
  • Why did President Wilson withdraw American troops from Mexico in 1917?
    10·2 answers
  • How did Shawn Mendes make a difference in the world?<br><br>(Need this for Biography Homework♡)
    13·2 answers
  • Why is the code of Hammurabi an important historical document
    12·1 answer
  • The Indian tradition of<br> requires women to be isolated in separate quarters.
    10·1 answer
  • Can someone plz help me? :(
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!