How did black codes impact resistance during reconstruction

1 answer:

4 0

Black codes were restrictive laws designed to limit the freedom of African Americans and ensure their availability as a cheap labor force after slavery was abolished during the Civil War. Though the Union victory had given some 4 million slaves their freedom, the question of freed blacks’ status in the postwar South was still very much unresolved. Under black codes, many states required blacks to sign yearly labor contracts; if they refused, they risked being arrested, fined and forced into unpaid labor. Outrage over black codes helped undermine support for President Andrew Johnson and the Republican Party.

You might be interested in

what was the impact of the great society on legislation and how was it both like and not like the new deal?

USPshnik [31]

New Deal is the name given by the president of the United States Franklin D. Roosevelt to his interventionist policy put in place to fight against the effects of the Great Depression in the United States. This program was developed between 1933 and 1938 with the objective of supporting the poorest layers of the population, reforming financial markets and revitalizing a wounded American economy since the crash of 1929 due to unemployment and bankruptcies.

Commonly, two New Deals are distinguished. A first, particularly marked by the "One Hundred Days of Roosevelt" in 1933, which pointed to an improvement in the situation in the short term. You can find, then, bank reform laws, urgent social assistance programs, help programs for work, or even agricultural programs. The Government made important investments and allowed access to financial resources through the various government agencies. The economic results were moderate, but the situation improved. The "Second New Deal" was extended between 1935 and 1938, putting forward a new distribution of resources and power on a broader scale, with trade union protection laws, the Social Security Act, as well as aid programs for farmers. and street workers.

The fight against the crisis lasted until the United States mobilized its economy with the Second World War. The success of the New Deal is undeniable on the social level. The policy led by President Franklin D. Roosevelt changed the country through reforms and not through a revolution. On the other hand, the New Deal programs were openly experimental, manifestly perfectible, and given the costs of this process, a more complete change program could have been preferred. However, the imperfect nature of the New Deal allowed a constructive criticism and a more deliberate reflection that opened the way to an improvement of American democracy in the following years and which lasts until today. In union matters, the adoption of the so-called Wagner Act allowed unions to become powerful collectives.

3 0

3 years ago

What were the result of the reign and overthrow of James II?

Simora [160]

Answer:

James II, also called (1644–85) duke of York and (1660–85) duke of Albany, (born October 14, 1633, London, England—died September 5/6 [September 16/17, New Style], 1701, Saint-Germain, France), king of England, Scotland, and Ireland from 1685 to 1688, and the last Stuart monarch in the direct male line. He was deposed in the Glorious Revolution (1688–89) and replaced by William III and Mary II. That revolution, engendered by James’s Roman Catholicism, permanently established Parliament as the ruling power of England.

6 0

3 years ago

What is the cause of dollar diplomacy and the effect of pgp

Rom4ik [11]

Dollar Diplomacy, foreign policy created by U.S. Pres. William Howard Taft (served 1909–13) and his secretary of state, Philander C. Knox, to ensure the financial stability of a region while protecting and extending U.S. commercial and financial interests there.

4 0

3 years ago

Japan expanded her empire in the 1930s and 1940s to include parts of (1) eastern Europe and the Middle East (2) China and Southe

11111nata11111 [884]

#2 is the correct answer since they are the closest to conquer

8 0

3 years ago

Brainliest for whoever answers quickest and correctly

Black_prince [1.1K]

Answer:

1. D

2. A

3. C

4. The Democratic Party is making a serious blunder in criticizing President Roosevelt’s foreign policy .

There can result nothing but praise and admiration for the President’s policy.

Explanation:

In 1902, the European forces announced blockage on Venezuela due to the country’s rejection to resolve foreign debts. In consequence, the Roosevelt Corollary came into force.

In 1904, the US president Theodore Roosevelt put in force the Roosevelt Corollary, an extension to the Monroe doctrine. It assured the protection of the US over the countries of Latin America and its intervention in foreign affairs regarding the European countries.

The US had made it clear that they were a force to fear and Theodore Roosevelt was aware of that. They were an established military force as had been proven by its great victory against Spain in 1898.

This was what was pre-required for Roosevelt to exercise his Big Stick policy: the country had to have proven capable to strike, but peaceful and willing to negotiate at a time. It seemed to work as Germany decided to back off on Venezuelan blockage after the US intervention.

Before the completion of the Panama Canal, the US trade route was incredibly long and devastating. On top, the perishable goods would have spoiled during the (at least) three-month-long trip.

The Panama Canal facilitated all of that. The US boats had a significantly shorter route to take, the former time was cut and it allowed faster shipping, lower fuel costs, and therefore – more trade.

The Democratic Party is making a serious blunder in criticizing President Roosevelt’s foreign policy

In this sentence, it is the word blunder that suggests the writer’s attitude on the matter. A blunder is a stupid mistake committed out of ignorance. The use of this type of word originates from a subjective point of view.

There can result nothing but praise and admiration for the President’s policy.

The author of the text is clearly taking sides, as he assures that there is only one possible way to think of the President Roosevelt’s policy: nothing but praise and admiration.

7 0

3 years ago