Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
(-1)^2 = 1
(-1)^3 = -1
(-1)^5 = -1
(1) (-1) (-1) = 1
Answer:
a and d
Step-by-step explanation:
brainliest if you want :)
Answer:
21 is the answer for 18x +3
Step-by-step explanation:
18x + 3
x=3+18
x=21
Answer:
y = -6
Step-by-step explanation:
12 (5 + 2y) = 4y- (6 - 9y)
= 60 + 24y = 4y - 6 + 9y
= 60 + 24y = 13y - 6
= 24y - 13y = -6 - 60
= 11y = -66
y = -6
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.