Answer:
In some of the most influential democracies in the world, large segments of the population are no longer receiving unbiased news and information. This is not because journalists are being thrown in jail, as might occur in authoritarian settings. Instead, the media have fallen prey to more nuanced efforts to throttle their independence. Common methods include government-backed ownership changes, regulatory and financial pressure, and public denunciations of honest journalists. Governments have also offered proactive support to friendly outlets through measures such as lucrative state contracts, favorable regulatory decisions, and preferential access to state information. The goal is to make the press serve those in power rather than the public.
The problem has arisen in tandem with right-wing populism, which has undermined basic freedoms in many democratic countries. Populist leaders present themselves as the defenders of an aggrieved majority against liberal elites and ethnic minorities whose loyalties they question, and argue that the interests of the nation—as they define it—should override democratic principles like press freedom, transparency, and open debate.
Among Free countries in Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report, 19 percent (16 countries) have endured a reduction in their press freedom scores over the past five years. This is consistent with a key finding of Freedom in the World—that democracies in general are undergoing a decline in political rights and civil liberties. It has become painfully apparent that a free press can never be taken for granted, even when democratic rule has been in place for decades.
Explanation:
hope it helps!
Answer:
Explanation:
The last storm was a real humdinger! I hear we're in for another humdinger of a storm!
Madame Sofronie's character is most developed through direct characterization, describing her physical appearance. Direct characterization is a way in which a character is introduced to the readers. It gives a clear overview of the character in a straightforward manner.
plz mark me as brainliest if this helped :)
This is unusual because one is more likely to be not a witch than be one as no one knows what makes a witch for certain.
Explanation:
In Act 3 of the play Martha Corey must tell the court and convince them that the allegation against her for being a witch is false.
She does this by giving her logic the way she can but is asked this bizarre question “How do you know, then, that you are not a witch?”.
The fault in the question is that by probability one cannot know someone to be a witch by guess because witches do not exist or as they believed in their time were rare.
So, for a woman to be declared one, the court would need definite proof for it to be true.
D the soul rising up to the intellectual world
