If your target audience is neutral because they do not know enough about the topic to have formed an opinion, they are <u>neutral audience</u>.
<h3>What is a neutral audience?</h3>
A neutral audience is typically one that is uninformed about the subject and has not yet formed an opinion. Our two tasks are to "educate" the audience and win them on to our point of view. But this instance of "informing" won't be as impartial as one that is strictly informational.
Instead, we present the material to the audience in a way that is compatible with the viewpoint we are promoting. We then give the audience arguments for agreeing with the position being promoted.
Learn more about neutral audience
brainly.com/question/473664
#SPJ4
Answer:
Report it to the supervisor. ... All health care facilities have the same policies and procedures
Answer:
Informal benchmarking
Explanation:
Generally, there are four different types of benchmarking.
Informal benchmarking: The term "informal benchmarking" is described as one of the different types of benchmarking that is being performed unconsciously by different people at home or work. However, it is an individual tendency to continuously learn and compare from the practices and behavior of another person including ways to play, use software program, or cook, etc.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the informal benchmarking.
They have more influence over them. they are a leader.
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
