<span>The answer is d) All of the above. Like playing the 'telephone game', when one person passes information on to another the information can be distorted by things like their ability to remember it clearly and their own feelings about the content. They may also add or take away from the content based on their own life experiences and feelings.</span>
In social studies, especially those in which you want to analyze or investigate the behavior, in many cases recreating the situation to be studied in a laboratory or the interaction of the researcher with the subject under investigation may be impossible or alter the result leading to false conclusions In these cases, the researcher resorts to naturalistic observation, which consists of observing or studying the subject in their natural conditions, in their environment, thus avoiding a change in the behavior of the researched, either because of the artificial nature of the experiment or because of the presence of a stranger, the researcher, in the environment.
Answer
In this case, the use of another method such as an interview or survey can result in a change of behavior or response by the interviewee, thus observing and recording the number of visitors without intervening with them is making a <em>naturalistic observation</em>
It is morally impermissible to treat people differently unless there are factual differences between them.
Factual differences. The possibility that the facts with respect to which this Agreement is entered into may differ from the facts that each Party currently knows or believes to be true is recognized and accepted by each of the Parties. The Parties concur that any such discrepancies in reality will not cause the termination or revocation of this Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.
If there is a disagreement regarding the interpretation, application, operation, or any alleged violation of the Agreement between the Employer and any employee(s), or between the Employer and the Union, the employee(s) shall continue to work in accordance with the Agreement until the disagreement is resolved.
Learn more about Factual differences here
brainly.com/question/21864490
#SPJ4
I had to look for the options and here is my answer:
Based on Seth's graduation project which is about conditioning a monkey to fear a flower, she might consider coming up with a different plan because the monkey does not possess any biological predisposition to be afraid of a flower, which makes this project difficult to achieve or rather impossible.
Many thousands of years ago, not a single human being lived in the Americas.
This only changed during the last Ice Age. It was a time when most of North America was covered with a thick sheet of ice, which made the Americas difficult to inhabit.
But at some point during this time, adventurous humans started their journey into a new world.
They probably came on foot from Siberia across the Bering Land Bridge, which existed between Alaska and Eurasia from the end of the last Ice Age until about 10,000 years ago. The area is now submerged by water.
There is still debate about when these first Americans actually arrived and where they came from. But we are now getting closer to uncovering the original narrative, and finding out who these first Americans really were. During the peak of the last Ice Age about 20,000 years ago, a journey from Asia into the Americas would not have been particularly desirable. North America was covered in icy permafrost and tall glaciers. But, paradoxically, the presence of so much ice meant that the journey was, in a way, easier than it would be today.
The abundance of ice meant that sea levels were much lower than they are now, and a stretch of land emerged between Siberia and Alaska. Humans and animals could simply walk from Asia to North America. The land bridge was called Beringia.
