Answer:
Language is like a way of communication. If you do not have the right word at the right time you cannot express your feelings and your say. In English there are exact words for exact things but in Hindi we repeat same words for many things this is the contraction between two languages for me if I have to say English is a very compact and brief language where you can easily learn new words and some amazing sentences and in English there are some sentences which you can only understand by the logical meaning not by the meaning that is written literally you have to use your own mind your own logic to know the exact meaning. If I write down some sentences
This sentence means that now it is time that we have to or we need to take the decision you can translate it into Hindi and make some nonsense meaning of it .
So language has its own importance logically practically and literally.
Answer:
Scapegoat theory
Explanation:
Scapegoat theory is blaming someone else for one's own problems this normally gives birth to the feelings of prejudice toward the person or group that one is blaming. Scapegoating serves as an strategy to explain failure, lack of taking responsibility,or misdeeds, while maintaining one’s positive self-image. If a person doesn't get good grades in school he or she could blame it on the fact that he or she is victimised by the teacher. the person may be using the teacher as a scapegoat and may end up hating the teacher and causing people to look at the teacher in a certain way Essentially, scapegoating generally employs a stand-in for one’s own failures so that one doesn’t have to face one’s own weaknesses.
Answer:
they can help lower risk they should never be revised
Explanation:
Answer:
George Washington was a man of extraordinary charisma and talent for leadership. The populace admired and respected him; his fellow soliders and officials did, too; he had dealings with outstanding people of his time who stood higher than he did intellectually level. Nevertheless, he was the leader.
According to a paper by reverend Richard C. Stazesky for the George Washington Club (2000) in Delaware , Washington´s leadership style shows the following characteristics:
- he had a vision of the cause that comprised ideas and goals that would not be changed no matter the circumstances;
- he was skillful in designing and creating an organizational culture that made possible the achievement of the leader´s vision and ideas;
- he was successful in gaining others for the cause by persuading them and by instilling in them his ideas, beliefs and values of his vision.
- as any other successful leader, he effectively combined in himself different roles to be played for the cause.
Explanation:
C” has remained the same for over fifty years
