The French Revolution and the American Revolution
<span>The correct answer should definitely be the evidence they collect. Novels based on the past and citizen interviews are often subjective and don't represent actual historical facts. Journalists can present things more objectivelly but they are in the end opinions and opinions are subjective. Gathering facts and data is important for analyzing and interpreting history correctly.</span>
I believe the answer is: It allowed noblemen, clergy, and townspeople to serve together as a legislative body in the French government.
By allowing this to happen, all segment of the french population could give their aspiration and influence the type of laws that can be passed by the french government. This create a bigger sense of unity among the French people and make it easier for them to mobilize under one national identity.
<span>In the 1850's, 1/4 of Southern white families owned slaves while the other 3/4 did not. About 88% of the total slave population was in the South's Confederacy, which was made up of about 3,500,000 people total. People who didn't own slaves were still willing to fight because they got most of their products from slaves and they didn't want to change that.</span>
After the fall of the Roman Empire, Europe deteriorated into a multitude of smaller sovereign states, mostly feudalistic in nature.
