1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Licemer1 [7]
3 years ago
11

How did African participation in the Great War alter African expectations about their future?

History
1 answer:
koban [17]3 years ago
3 0
<span>When the war ended on November 11, 1918, African Americans anxiously and optimistically hoped that their patriotic sacrifices would have a positive impact on race relations and expand the boundaries of civil rights. Political leaders attempted to exert influence on the Versailles peace proceedings. W. E. B. Du Bois organized a Pan-African Congress, held in Paris from February 19 to 21, 1919, which challenged the legitimacy of European colonialism. (Just use the important parts)
</span>
You might be interested in
What was the impact and/or relationship between Jim Crow laws / Jim Crow Era and the
lina2011 [118]

Answer:

In September 1895, Booker T. Washington, the head of the Tuskegee Institute in Alabama, stepped to the podium at the Atlanta Cotton States Exposition and implored white employers to “cast down your bucket where you are” and hire African Americans who had proven their loyalty even throughout the South’s darkest hours. In return, Washington declared, southerners would be able to enjoy the fruits of a docile work force that would not agitate for full civil rights. Instead, blacks would be “In all things that are purely social . . . as separate as the fingers.”

Washington called for an accommodation to southern practices of racial segregation in the hope that blacks would be allowed a measure of economic freedom and then, eventually, social and political equality. For other prominent blacks, like W. E. B. Du Bois who had just received his PhD from Harvard, this was an unacceptable strategy since the only way they felt that blacks would be able to improve their social standing would be to assimilate and demand full citizenship rights immediately.

Regardless of which strategy one selected, it was clear that the stakes were extremely high. In the thirty years since the Civil War ended African Americans had experienced startling changes to their life opportunities. Emancipation was celebrated, of course, but that was followed by an intense debate about the terms of black freedom: who could buy or sell property, get married, own firearms, vote, set the terms of employment, receive an education, travel freely, etc. Just as quickly as real opportunities seemed to appear with the arrival of Reconstruction, when black men secured unprecedented political rights in the South, they were gone when northern armies left in 1877 and the era of Redemption began. These were the years when white Southerners returned to political and economic power, vowing to “redeem” themselves and the South they felt had been lost. Part of the logic of Redemption revolved around controlling black bodies and black social, economic, and political opportunities. Much of this control took the form of so-called Jim Crow laws—a wide-ranging set of local and state statutes that, collectively, declared that the races must be segregated.

In 1896, the year after Washington’s Atlanta Cotton Exposition speech, the Supreme Court declared in Plessy v. Ferguson that racial segregation was constitutional. It would take fifty-eight years for that decision to be reversed (in Brown v. Board of Education). In the meantime, African Americans had to negotiate the terms of their existence through political agitation, group organizing, cultural celebration, and small acts of resistance. Much of this negotiation can be seen in the history of the Great Migration, that period when blacks began to move, generally speaking, from the rural South to the urban North. In the process, African Americans changed the terms upon which they exercised their claims to citizenship and rights as citizens.

There are at least two factual aspects of the Great Migration that are important to know from the start: 1) the black migration generally occurred between 1905 and 1930 although it has no concrete beginning or end and 2) from the standpoint of sheer numbers, the Great Migration was dwarfed by a second migration in the 1940s and early 1950s, when blacks became a majority urban population for the first time in history. Despite these caveats, the Great Migration remains important in part because it marked a fundamental shift in African American consciousness. As such, the Great Migration needs to be understood as a deeply political act.

Migration was political in that it often reflected African American refusal to abide by southern social practices any longer. Opportunities for southern blacks to vote or hold office essentially disappeared with the rise of Redemption, job instability only increased in the early twentieth century, the quality of housing and education remained poor at best, and there remained the ever-looming threat of lynch law if a black person failed to abide by local social conventions. Lacking even the most basic ability to protect their own or their children’s bodies, blacks simply left.

3 0
3 years ago
What is the European term used in describing social groups of India
adoni [48]

The Caste System

The term "caste" is used to describe stratified societies based on hereditary groups not only in South Asia but throughout the world. Others might present a biological explanation of India's stratification system, based on the notion that all living things inherit a particular set of qualities.

                                                                       

3 0
3 years ago
Which group of people fought against the colonial North Carolina government from 1765 to 1771?
Vaselesa [24]
The Regulators fought against Colonial North Carolina government from 1765-1771
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did trade with Asia change government in Europe in the 1500's
zaharov [31]
They change government in Europe because they were not good.
5 0
3 years ago
Why did Thomas Jefferson object to letting the national government issue a charter for a national bank?
Zolol [24]

Answer:

Giving Congress any power not explicitly granted by the Constitution will remove all limits on its power.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!
    6·2 answers
  • How did President Johnson plan to continue Kennedy's plan to eliminate poverty in America?
    11·2 answers
  • How did trade continue to have an impact on colonization
    12·1 answer
  • Between 1820 and 1850, some Americans discriminated against German immigrants because they
    7·2 answers
  • How did Emperror Taizong come to tule the Tang dynasty
    13·2 answers
  • describe how the amount of air changes as you travel up through earths atmosphere. Help me plz if i dont do this im in troble by
    9·1 answer
  • Please help only if you plan on answering ALL four questions <br> please and thank u
    14·2 answers
  • After the Congress of Vienna, Europe...
    12·2 answers
  • What is meant by the "rule of law" that has been historically traced as an important idea in the Magna Carta and the English Bil
    6·2 answers
  • Which of the following gives all of the sets that contain Negative one-half? the set of all rational numbers and the set of all
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!