Answer:
$16.9 per widget
Explanation:
Given that,
Beginning inventory = $2,500
Purchases = $156,000
Ending inventory = $38,200
Sales Revenue = $783,000
Selling and Administrative Expenses = $5,400
Total cost of the 7,100 widgets:
= Beginning inventory + Purchases - Ending inventory
= $2,500 + $156,000 - $38,200
= $120,300
Therefore,
Cost of one widget = Total cost of the 7,100 widgets ÷ Number of widgets
= $120,300 ÷ 7,100
= $16.9 per widget
Answer: Yes
Explanation: In the above case, a quasi-contract was formed. This is when a bilateral contract is not in place but one party will enjoy the benefit of the activities of the other party and may be enriched by it.
A bilateral agreement is the exchange of a promise for another and in this case would have been, the promise that Dozier would pay for Paschall’s work. This was not established, however, Dozier will benefit from Paschall’s work unduly if he does not pay for the improvements. The law holds that he has to pay for Paschall’s work to prevent being unjustly enriched.
The correct answer is: Weight
May the Talos guide you
The 2018 journal entries for Milani<span> related to its investment in </span>Seida<span> are its share in net income and share in dividends. The investment in considered as investment in associate since there is already the significant influence in </span>Seida. These are the journal entries:
<span>Investment in </span>Seida 12,0000
<span> Share in net income of </span>Seida<span> ($30,000 x 40%) 12,000</span>
#
Cash ($110,000 x 40%) 44,000
<span> Investment in </span>Seida 44,000<span> </span>
<span> #</span>
