Answer:
B) There is an inflationary gap, and contractionary fiscal policy is appropriate.
Explanation:
One of the macroeconomic cases is inflationary gap. It means that the difference between the current level of real gross domestic product (GDP) and the predicted or forecasted GDP that would be experienced and achieved if an economy is at full employment. It could be claimed that when the demand for goods and services gets over the production in the factors such as: higher levels of overall employment, increased trade activities or increased government expenditure.
In order to overcome this gap, the contractionary fiscal policy must be considered. The mechanism of that policy is to increase the taxes decrease the government expenses due to inflationary pressures. This policy consequently will affect the level of consumption and private investment, respectively, these also will decrease the real GDP.
Other concept of macroeconomics is recessionary gap. In comparison to inflationary gap, this concept indicates the economy operating at lower level than its full equilibrium level, in turn, the level of real GDP is also less than full equilibrium level. We used to see this situation when the economy was intending to recess.
In order to overcome this gap, the expansionary fiscal policy will work well. Because of decreasing taxes and increasing government expenditures, the recessionary gap can be fought anymore. Since the taxes decreases, the business will revive and the confidence to the investment will increase, as a result the GDP will rise. Moreover, the growing government expenditures will stimulate the GDP to accrue.
To summarize, according to the question we need the gap in which the economy is above of potential, this means inflationary gap. Following this finding, the contractionary fiscal policy will be solution.
Mega is likely liable for trespassing. It is because when an
individual trespass on someone else’s property without the owner’s consent, the
individual who had trespass would likely be liable or detained for trespassing on
someone else’s property and can be charged based on the law.
Answer:
The president of Riggs has missed something.
She should make the Sail instead of buying because its cheaper to manufacture than purchasing it outside.
Explanation:
<u>Cost of Manufacturing the Sails:</u>
Direct materials $93
Direct Labor $83
Total $173
The president of Riggs has included the $90 overhead based on $78,000 of annual fixed overhead that is allocated using normal capacity in the cost of manufacturing the sail which is incorrect.
Riggs Company is operating at 80 % of full capacity, hence utelizing the 20% excess capacity would not expand its fixed costs.
Thus said the current fixed cost are irrelevent for this decison and would be incurred whether or not Riggs Company utilizes the excess capacity
<u>Conclusion:</u>
The cost of making the sail is $173 which is lower than the cost of buying them at $ 258.
I would advise The president of Riggs to make the sail by utilizing the excess capacity since its cheaper than purchasing it outside.
Answer:
a. False
Explanation:
A "primary transaction" refers to the selling of <em>new stocks and bonds</em> for the first time towards the public. A great example of this is the "Initial Public Offering" <em>(IPO)</em> which allows "public share issuance."
On the other hand, a "secondary transaction" refers to the<em> trading of investors among themselves.</em> There is no involvement of the issuing companies here. So, this means that if an investor uses the services of a broker to buy and sell stocks that are currently being traded in the stock market,<u> the transaction</u><u> doesn't directly involve the issuing compan</u><u>y.</u> This kind of transaction is then called "secondary."
So, this explains the answer.
