Answer:
Yes, these facts are valid against Hannah which comes under Ratification Doctrine.
Explanation:
Here in the question its given that Hannah had allowed her friend to lend her computer for a one week period which was during her thanks giving break.
During those times Carol sold that laptop to a friend which was one of them in their class without asking hannah about this.
Now when after the break hannah and carol both return then carol told her that she had sold her laptop because she was getting an amount from the buyer which was too good to pass up so shesold it that moment.
Now when she gave that money to Hannah she instead of scolding her thanked her and her expression was seeming to be like she had done an awsome job for her.
So, based on the facts the contract was valid because it came under Ratification Doctrine.
Answer:
Explanation:
The cost allocation of each lot is presented below:
(A) (B) (A × B)
Lot Appraised Value Percentage Purchase value Allocated cost
Lot 1 $76,500 15% $355,000 $53,250
Lot 2 $229,500 45% $355,000 $159,750
Lot 3 $204,000 40% $355,000 $142,000
Total $510,000 100% $355,000
Now the journal entry would be
Land - Lot 1 $53,250
Land - Lot 2 $159,750
Land - Lot 3 $142,000
To Cash A/c $355,000
(Being the lots are purchased for cash)
Answer:
According to Amazon, the demographics report “shows Brand Owners the breakdown of their Amazon customers (in aggregate) by age, household income, education, gender, and marital status.
hope this helps <3
Answer:
li siento no puesobhsdar las resouestav
Answer:
False
Explanation:
A country has comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with its trading partners.
I hope my answer helps you
