The events that took place are matched to their causes rooted in the Articles of Confederation as follows:
- <u>Shays' Rebellion:</u> Could not maintain an army in peacetime
- <u>Mount Vernon Conference:</u> Could not regulate interstate trade.
- <u>Philadelphia Mutiny:</u> No power to raise money.
<h3>What are the Articles of Confederation?</h3>
The Articles of Confederation are the first written documents that were regarded as the Constitution of the United States of America, which was agreed upon by the thirteen (13) original states.
Under the Articles of Confederation, the federal government was unable to raise money due to the following reasons:
- The federal government was not given the power to regulate trade.
- The federal government needed approval of the states to collect taxes.
- The state and national currencies competed with each other.
In conclusion, the lack of enforcement powers under the Articles of Confederation also affected the ability of the confederate Congress to make decision because it made it very difficult, as they required nine (9) of the thirteen (13) original states to agree before they could take any action on a subject matter in accordance with Article VII.
Read more on Articles of Confederation here: brainly.com/question/24139386
#SPJ1
<span>Reformers in the U.S. adopted aspects of the Prussian education system, such as compulsory schooling and grade levels. </span>
Answer:
Armstrong established jazz as music that prizes individual expression. His records showed that an improvised music could have the weight and durability of written music. But to compete on Armstrong's level, a musician had to do more than master an instrument; he had to make the instrument an extension of his self.
Explanation:(happy to help)
Simple Answer: Tariffs
A tariff is a tax (in this case) on imports. The South, particularly South Carolina, objected strongly to the high rate of taxation on goods she desparately needed. The rates did seem a little high -- 62% on 92% of the goods coming into South Carolina (and other southern states). For example if South Carolina want to import 1000 dollars worth of shovels, she would have to pay an additional 620 dollars to do it.
The acts of 1828 and 1832 were thought by the South to be ruinous because not only would she be forced to pay much more for basic needs, she would not be able to sell her cotton to Great Britain because of the way the tax was imposed.
Thus a very strong case was built for disobedience to the 1828 and 1832 acts. What made those two acts a pain was that North was determined to force unity on a South that had other economic problems during the 1830s (like drought). So the nullification process meant that something had to be done or South Carolina was threatening to go to war to protect her economy.
Thus the Tariff act of 1833 was introduced, and though you have not asked anything about that, I think you should note that Act was intended to unruffle South Carolina's feathers. It was a grand compromise devised by Andrew Jackson's administration. It succeeded until 1842 when it's tenure was up. You can read all of this by reading more about the Nullification Crisis. Be sure and read about Jackson's comments on it.
So this rather complex turn of events all really hinged on money and standard's of living. The vocabulary used was States Rights Vs Federal Rights. Put in very simple language: who has more rights, the one or the many? It took a civil war some 30 years later to resolve that question.
