It's important to note that most colonists, including the Puritans, didn't treat Native Americans with respect. They would enslave them, try to convert them to Christianity, and force them off the lands they had held for centuries (without any payment, even!). William Penn was different. He did NOT enslave them (B is incorrect), nor did he ignore them (C is incorrect). Instead, he tried to make peace with them. He treated them with respect, by letting them keep their traditions separate from the colonists (A is incorrect) and, when he needed land, paid a fair price for it. D is correct!
Answer: D
Answer:
Option C “Rome wanted to keep Carthage from completely taking over Sicily”
Explanation:
During its plans for expansion as a great Empire, Rome wanted to take over Sicily, which at that moment was under control of Carthage. As a maritime focal point, the fact of dominating Sicily translated into having commercial and military power, and thus was key for expansion over sea (264-146 AC).
Multiple legal battles and a Constitutional Court stalemate that prevented further action prevented the idea from being fully implemented.
<h3>What does it take to be president?</h3>
every single elected post in a country with an election government that acts also as head of state but often only has limited political authority. a president who is elected to serve as both the highest ideological executive and head of state under a system that has monarchic overtones.
<h3>Do you mean president, or leader?</h3>
In different businesses and organizations, the president may act as the leader of the executive team. However, in the commercial world, the general head of the organization is not always the best choice.
To know more about President visit:
brainly.com/question/4512901
#SPJ4
In general terms, most human beings are committed to obeying the law. However, to give a well-founded answer it's important to take into consideration the concepts of <em>ethics </em>and <em>morality</em> and also the cultures involved in this matter. Having said that, in the dilemma of a person being forced to choose between breaking the law to help a friend or not breaking the law but disappointing a friend, the results I would expect are the following:
The Hindu population (adults and children), based on the complex and inherent concept of <em>Dharma, </em>which assigns a high value to right conduct, ethics and morality, would tend to prioritise the obedience to law while the group of Americans would probably hesitate in this forced decision. Some psychology specialists talk about a moral crisis in America in which the limits of moral conviction, virtues and vices, good and evil, right and wrong are not very clear. If this applies to a vast part of American society, they would not be expected to choose law obedience in first place.
Answer:
the two countries have many difficulties getting along. They never came up with a compromise.
