Answer:
the magna carta
Explanation:
it was written in 1215, way before the pilgrims
<span>In America’s version of federalism, power is shared b</span>etween the state and federal governments.
Answer:
1. investigation and an interview
2. investigation
3. interview
4. interview
5. investigation
6. interview
Answer:
Lower supply and a shortage
Explanation:
In cases of emergency the prices connected with some good normally increases, even if the good isn't produced in the affected area. The costs of transport, logistic, storage and selling e.g, increases because of shortage of all other goods, reflecting in a chain effect. When a price is set below the equilibrium price, the quantity supplied will be lower than the quantity demanded, by consequence the maximum price may lead a lower supply and a shortage.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
