Answer: Accommodating style
Explanation: Conflict handling style technique which is geared towards fostering harmony and togetherness. The accommodating style of conflict handling is possible whereby one truly cherish a relationship and his willing to give up anything in other to ensure everything works out fine. It requires one to be calm and 'down to earth' or rather low degree of assertiveness and devoid of arrogance. Usually the the accommodating se of conflict handling requires selflessness and sacrifice which will be required in other to avoid jeopardizing the harmony of a relationship due to conflict.
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
Yes, I think that identifying the purpose would increase the credibility of the source, so if we understand the "should" here as "would be good if, is recommended" - then this statement is true.
Including the intent of the information in the source will help place the information in a wider context - and often the context is necessary to fully understand the content of a source.
Answer:
i believe it would be, true
Explanation:
Self-defense is recognized by the common law as a defense against criminal charges on certain specific grounds.
<h3><u>Explanation:
</u></h3>
If in a gruesome act of self-defense, there is a serious bodily injury or death of the person attempting to hurt or potentially kill the other person, the act of the former is considered valid and reasonable.
This is because the common law grants each and every individual the right to fight and the right to defend oneself in situations that may culminate in death or serious physical injury.
