1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Step2247 [10]
3 years ago
12

The Glorious Revolution of 1688 demonstrated that Parliament had

History
2 answers:
san4es73 [151]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is c) power over the English monarchy.

The Glorious Revolution happened during 1688-1689 it was caused by religious and political - King James defended policies of religious tolerances and members of leading political circles were bothered by this - and it established that the  parliament had supremacy over the crown. This lead the path to England become a constitutional monarchy and parliamentary democracy.

matrenka [14]3 years ago
5 0

The Glorious Revolution of 1688 demonstrated that Parliament had:

(C) Power over the English monarchy

<h3>Further explanation</h3>

The glorious revolution was a revolt of the English people against King James II. This king was unpopular because of his brutal and undemocratic policy, especially he was a Catholic who scared Protestants, the majority group in England. This group was worried because King James II was giving important positions to Catholics in the army and universities. He also imprisoned English bishops who refused to preach for freedom of worship. It was the birth of James Francis Edward, a possible Catholic successor of James II who pushed the English parliament to react.

They asked William III, Stadtholder of the Netherlands, husband of Mary, one of the king's daughters, to come with an army to fight his father-in-law. He landed in England on November 15, 1688, with an army of more than 21,000 men, consisting of Dutch mercenaries, French Huguenots, English, and Scottish volunteers.

James II was not strong enough to resist this invasion, so he went to take refuge in France. William II and Mary Stuart took power very easily because of the agreement of parliament. After that short revolution, we can see that this institution had much more power than the king at that time.

<h3>Learn more</h3>
  • Bill of Rights: brainly.com/question/576913
  • The Magna Carta: brainly.com/question/1590051
  • The French Huguenots: brainly.com/question/216414

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Subject: History

Chapter: History of England

Keywords: democracy in England, kings of England, house of Stuart, English revolutions

You might be interested in
PLEASE HELP ME ASAP I'M BEING TIMED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Allushta [10]

Answer:

Most likely D.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Supporters of the Dawes Act said the act would help American Indians to
harkovskaia [24]
Many whites wanted Indian land, and knew it would be easier to gain if the Indian tribes disappeared. With that statement appeared the Dawes Act, also known as the General Allotment Act, in February 1887. A scheme was soon developed for Indians that would allow individual Indians to own land for private use, and the Indians would be converted into capitalists. 
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What impact did European explores have on the Americans
Ahat [919]
That they were trying to steal there land
3 0
3 years ago
The supreme court ruled in bureau v. mcdowell that _____________ apply/applies only to the actions of government agents and not
Gnoma [55]
Unlawful search and seizure, the Supreme Court Ruling found that incriminating materials given to government representatives by private citizens or employees do not have the same rules regarding lawful search and seizure. For example, if someone provides incriminating documents that were procured without a search warrant and that someone is a private citizen, these documents are admissible in court and not subject to the same search and seizure laws as if they were being collected by a police officer. 
7 0
3 years ago
When is the earliest evidence of soccer being played? *
Hitman42 [59]

Answer:

FIFA publicly confirmed in 2004 that "the very earliest form of the game for which there is scientific evidence was an exercise from a military manual dating back to the second and third centuries B.C. in China." Called Cuju, meaning "kickball," the game prospered during the Han dynasty from 206 B.C. to 220 A.D.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • To tell a compelling story about history in written form, historians often rely on to keep readers interested.
    6·1 answer
  • Bronze age civilization found in the aegean and based on a warrior aristocracy Is which civilization
    11·1 answer
  • How did the first Americans get to America?
    12·2 answers
  • What was President Johnson's Great Society?
    7·1 answer
  • How do moonstones affect cold weather
    5·1 answer
  • What was not a cause of the European enlightenment? A.the Protestant b. The scientific revolution C. Secular humanism D. The mon
    15·2 answers
  • What city did george washington first work as president?
    10·1 answer
  • Which phrase best completes the diagram?
    10·1 answer
  • How are living organisms in an ecosystem linked?
    6·1 answer
  • What is the area in question ceded in the government?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!