Answer:
Establish a police constitution
Answer:
Incomplete question
Complete question:
A society that puts equality—in the sense of equality of outcome—ahead of freedom will
end up with neither equality nor freedom. The use of force to achieve equality will destroy freedom, and the force, introduced for good purposes, will end up in the hands of people who use it to promote their own interests. On the other hand, a society that puts freedom first will, as a happy by-product, end up with both greater freedom and greater equality. A free society releases the energies and abilities of people to pursue their own objectives. It prevents some people from arbitrarily suppressing others. It does not prevent people from achieving positions of privilege, but so long as freedom is maintained, it prevents those positions of privilege from becoming institutionalized.
—Milton Friedman, Free to Choose (1980)
Which of the following governmental policies would the author most likely support?
a) Restricting individuals from carrying guns in public.
b) Allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational use.
c) Requiring individuals traveling in cars to wear seat belts.
d) Establishing minimun age requirements to access adult social media sites.
Answer: b) Allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational use
Explanation:
The author is most likely to support the Government in allowing individuals to purchase marijuana for recreational purposes because he was very much emphatic about the freedom of individuals to do what makes them happy.
Answer: True
Explanation:
In Kyllo v. United States (2001), a 5-4 opinion was delivered by Justice Antonin Scalia in which the Court held that the Government used a device that is not in public use, to explore details of the home that would previously have been unknowable without physical intrusion hence the surveillance is a 'search' and is unreasonable without a warrant.
Answer:
<em>C. It argued that privacy extends to a woman’s reproductive system.</em>
Explanation:
Roe versus Wade is a case that a petition was signed against Texas for the right to an abortion, that was denied to a woman which claimed she had been pregnant as a result of being raped, because it was illegal to abort unless the mother’s life was in danger.
Her arguments called out for the right to privacy of a woman. The Supreme Court decided she legality had the right to have an abortion based in privacy, because the case took so long she had the baby, later she even tried to take the case out of the court and began an anti-abortion organization.
Answer:
The district was drawn to the advantage of the party in control of the state legislature.
Explanation:
