1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
musickatia [10]
3 years ago
11

Ernest Burns, Orlando summemour, and randy Hatcher formed swi Partners, a general partner- ship. J. t. turner Construction Compa

ny obtained a judgment against swi Partners and Burns for breach of contract and negligent construction. as a judgment creditor, J. t. turner then filed a lawsuit against summemour and Hatcher, alleging that they were jointly and severally liable for the judg- ment against swi Partners. summemour and Hatcher responded that they could not be held liable for the judgment against swi Partners until they "had their day in court." were summemour and Hatcher liable?
Business
1 answer:
SpyIntel [72]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE

Explanation:

What is Partnership

Partnership is a form of business, where individuals come together to carry on business with the primary intention of making profit. Mostly, they come together by contributing capital and expertise to make the business work . Every partner is however liable and responsible for both the profit made and the losses or liabilities of the partnership.

Although the general partner has unlimited liability, every partner is however jointly and severely liable for the business

Were Summemour and Hatcher Liable?

This case is referred in the J.T. Turner Construction Company v. Summerour and Hatcher(2009). The court this case declared that both Hatcher and Summemour were jointly and severally liable as a result of the following reasons.

A partner becomes liable especially for a prior judgment based on the following

1. The partnership has proven indebtedness

2. A general partner in the partnership was sued to court

Based on these, Summemour and Hatcher WERE JOINTLY and SEVERALLY LIABLE

You might be interested in
InSeason Inc. started a chain of organic supermarkets that had initial success. The managers achieved a mastery of the firm's cu
Hitman42 [59]

Answer: Resistance to change

Explanation: In the given case the managers of Inseason inc. made the focus on short term goals rather than the long term. The manager in the given case did not took proper actions to continue the firm with large scale operations.

The managers was resisting the change due to the risk factor that it might not lead to benefit and the continuous success that the entity is making might stop.

Thus, the correct option is A.

4 0
3 years ago
Many hydrothermal mineral deposits of copper, gold, silver, and other metals have been found in the countries bordering the paci
Brums [2.3K]
Qerrtuipkfszb bjgactyesouvpj jcotstick jcyo
7 0
2 years ago
The publisher of an economics textbook finds that, when the book's price is lowered from $70 to $60, sales rise from 10,000 to 1
ankoles [38]

Answer:

Price elasticity of demand = 2.6

Explanation:

Given:

Old price (P0) = $70

New price (P1) = $60

Old sales (Q0) = 10,000 units

New sales (Q1) = 15,000 units

Computation of Price elasticity of demand(e):

Midpoint method

e=\frac{\frac{Q1-Q0}{\frac{Q1+Q0}{2} } }{\frac{P1-P0}{\frac{P1+P0}{2} } }

By putting the value:

e=\frac{\frac{10,000-15,000}{\frac{10,000+15,000}{2} } }{\frac{60-70}{\frac{60+70}{2} } }\\e=\frac{\frac{-5,000}{\frac{25,000}{2} } }{\frac{-10}{\frac{130}{2} } }\\

e=\frac{\frac{-5,000}{12,500} }{\frac{-10}{65} }

e =  2.6

7 0
3 years ago
Michelle always drives down hampton avenue to go to the work. one morning michelle discovers that hampton avenue is closed at wo
Vlad1618 [11]
She follows the Detour signs around the Work Area.
8 0
3 years ago
Inc.'s capital structure features 40 percent equity, 60 percent debt, and that its before-tax cost of debt is 9 percent, while i
Alex787 [66]

Answer:

WACC = ke(E/V) + Kd(D/V)

WACC = 15(0.40) + 9(0.60)

WACC = 6 + 5.4

WACC = 11.4%

Explanation:

WACC is a function of cost of equity multiplied by the proportion of equity in the capital structure plus cost of debt multiplied by the proportion of debt in the capital structure. The proportion of equity in the capital is expressed as E/V (0.40) while the proportion of debt in the capital structure is expressed as D/V (0.60).

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • A company has the following aging schedule of its accounts receivable with the estimated percent uncollectible:______.
    5·1 answer
  • List the steps of the rational model of decision making in the correct order
    8·1 answer
  • During May, 2018, Sugar Inc. performs consulting services. The client does not pay Sugar until June, 2018. Multiple Choice Using
    9·1 answer
  • Show the changes to the t-accounts for the federal reserve and for commercial banks when the federal reserve buys $50 million in
    7·1 answer
  • Laura Bryant joined Kellogg's straight after university in 2002. She joined the Field Sales team initially. This involved visiti
    15·1 answer
  • tahir owns and operates a gym. In 2020, he purchased and placed the following new assets into service for his business: March 17
    15·1 answer
  • At December 31, 2017, the available-for-sale debt portfolio for Carla, Inc. is as follows. Security Cost Fair Value Unrealized G
    11·1 answer
  • When you start the idea process, what do you list first?
    13·2 answers
  • The laws passed by Congress and by state legislatures are called:
    12·2 answers
  • True or False? Given that so many countries around the world already use care management and evidence-based medicine in their he
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!