The U.S. taxing power, while very broad, has important limitations. First, direct taxes must be apportioned, a very difficult requirement. Second, duties, imposts, and excises must be uniform—an easy-to-meet standard, but one which, if ignored, can be fatal to a statute.
P.S. I hope this helps
I guess the correct answer is Making products and counseling available when consumers need them.
In the fact that you are concerned with the level of service provided to those in need at odd hours and after hours and in the neighborhoods where such extended service is needed, then your our concerns are centered on making products and counseling available when consumers need them.
Well the answer is quite easy just count From 170 to 180 and that leaves u with 10 so ur answer is ten
Answer:
less than the government spending multiplier
Explanation:
Given :
Percentage spends by a households for the increase in the income = 75%
So the mpc = 0.75
Potential output = 600 billion arcs
The government multiplier is = 
= 4
The tax multiplier is = 
= 3
Thus we see that the tax multiplier is less than the government spending multiplier.
Answer:
25.89%
Explanation:
With regards to the above information, initial earning = $0.50
Final earnings = $5.0
Number of periods = 10 years
We can formulate the above into an equation, which will now be:
$5.00 = $0.5 ( 1 + rate )^ 10
We can simplify furthermore.
1 + rate ^ 10 = 5 / 0.5
1 + rate ^ 10 = 10
1 + rate ^ 10 = 10^1/10
1 + rate = 10 ^ 0.1
1 t rate = 1.2589
rate = 1.2589 - 1
rate = 0.2589
rate = 25.89%
Therefore, the growth rate in earnings per share (EPS) over the 10 year period is 25.89% .
