Question

Dr. C. Everett Koop, formerly Surgeon General of the United States, presents the following A A situation. It involves a 5-year-old girl who has a type of childhood brain tumor that Dr. Koop has studied for many years. The child's original tumor was removed, but it has recurred in spite of all known treatment. Dr. Koop writes: "I know her days are limited and that the longer she lives the more likely she is to have considerable pain. She might also become both blind and deaf." He goes on to explain that the child is severely anemic and this causes C her to be unaware of what is happening to her. If he treats the anemia, this may prolong her life. At the same time, it will increase her awareness of pain and ability to understand her situation. Anticancer drugs can be prescribed, but he knows these have no chance of curing the child. Dr. Koop poses the question "Would it be better to let this little girl slip into death quietly... or should we prolong her life?"
1. It can be argued that it is Dr. Koop's responsibility child's condition, including the anemia. Do you agree? Explain your answer. as a physician to treat all aspects of the

2. Should anyone else be involved in making the decision about how to treat this child? Explain why

3. Discuss what you think should be done for this child.

Answer 1

Explanation:

1. it's his responsibility in my view point.

2. It's up to the parents to make the choice.

3. I think it should be treated, but whatever the parents decides.