It is true that it is possible for a population to not evolve for a while.
There is something called the Hardy-Weinberg theorem, which characterizes the distributions of genotype frequencies in populations that are not evolving.
There are 5 Hardy-Weinberg assumptions:
- no mutation
- random mating
- no gene flow
- infinite population size
- and no selection (natural nor forced).
You can see that some of these are kinda extreme and really hard to get, but with approximations, we can work.
For example, instead of an "infinite population size" we have enough with a really large population, such that genetic drift is negligible.
Concluding, yes, it is possible (but really difficult) for a population to not evolve for a while (at least, in nature), as long as the 5 assumptions above are met.
If you want to learn more, you can read:
brainly.com/question/19431143
Answer:
Human, nervous system, nerve tissue, neurons.
Explanation:
The organism is the biggest, in this case is a human, a human is composed of systems, and then organ tissue, and organ tissue is made out of cells.
Answer:
good question, you don't. Or simply wait untill you finish choking bart
The answer is b because it is negative on our world
Plants make energy which some of the process is function of living
