Answer: ok
Explanation:
I know how to use the food web to determine......
Answer:
125
Explanation:
The correct option would be 125.
<em>The carrying capacity of a particular environment generally refers to the maximum number of individuals of a particular species that the environment can support at a particular time based on the resources it has. Hence, the maximum population of a species will normally oscillate around the carrying capacity of the environment where it is found. </em>
In the case of the elephants in the illustration, the maximum population recorded was 125. The population decreased from this value at some point only to increased back to it later.
<u>Hence, the carrying capacity for the elephant is 125.</u>
The answer is D. at least im pretty sure...
There was two of the same question, but here is the answer again with a little more depth.
D - spine alignment and foot size.
It was only the late Australopiths that had an S-shaped spine. This allowed for them to be bipedal, that is, the ability to walk on two legs as we do. This is because the S-shaped spine allowed them to balance when they were standing. The late Australopiths also have shorter and less flexible toes. These smaller, but sturdier feet made pushing off the ground much easier - aiding in their bipedalism.
