1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kitty [74]
4 years ago
13

Each of the following is a principle of the samurai honor code bushido except

History
1 answer:
Jlenok [28]4 years ago
4 0
D is the correct answer 
You might be interested in
Which is the best example of a secondary source document useful in the study of history?
ziro4ka [17]

Answer:need a answer

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
What were the effects of the 1948 Arab-Israeli<br> War and the Six Day war on:
vladimir2022 [97]

Answer:

The main effects of the Arab-Israeli War and the Six Day War were the consolidation and territorial expansion of Israel within the Middle East.

The Arab-Israeli War took place between May 14, 1948 and July 20, 1949, that is, it began one day after Israel's declaration of independence. This war pitted Israel against Egypt, Syria, Transjordan, Lebanon, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and other Muslim minority forces, which rejected the establishment of a Jewish state on Muslim lands in the Middle East. Despite the initial strength of this Arab coalition, Israel won the war and consolidated its territorial presence in the territories that had been granted to it by the UN.

In turn, the Six Day War occurred between June 5 and 10, 1967, where Israel carried out a series of preemptive attacks against its neighbors, who were gathering military forces on its borders. As a consequence of this war, that ended in victory for Israel, this country expanded its territorial domains, gaining control of the Golan Heights, from Syria; the West Bank, from Jordan; and the Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula from Egypt.

8 0
4 years ago
PLEASE HELP WILL MARK YOU AS BRAINLEST
tangare [24]

I fully approve the idea of creating a legislative branch with two houses. First if we'd had only one house how would the states have been represented? By population? In that case the states with the largest populations would have all legislated solely in their benefit and often to the detriment of the states with smaller populations. Ok so we create a legislative branch with one house based only on equal representation of each state right? But the problem here is representation would then be of the state but we the people for of and by whom the government was being formed would have no direct voice in the legislative branch. A government that is directly responsive only to the people can devolve into rule by the mob such as we saw happen in France following their revolution. They had a unicameral legislative government the house of deputies and it was directly responsive to the people giving way to rule by the mob and the horrors that bred the reign of terror with thousands of people beheaded including children accused of being counter revolutionaries. There was no senior house to temper if you will the will of the people or take a longer view if you will of whats best for the nation as a whole. Our House of Representatives is suppose to be more parochial in its view they represent our will (or rather they are suppose to) the Senate is given a longer term and originally they were not elected by the people of their states but rather depending on the state either elected by the state's legislative branches or directly appointed by the state's Governor. US Senators as that house was originally constituted were suppose to be somewhat more independent from the people although not completely independent because they worked for the state not the people but the people to whom they were accountable were elected by the people of the state. During President Wilson's term in office he pushed for and got an amendment that made the US Senate (to his way of thinking more democratic). I personally think it reduced the US Senate to being more political by making the Senators more directly accountable to the people. More democracy is not always desirable as we can see from the experience of France and her reign of terror.  

I read a biography of John Adams this past summer. John Adams was the man who first pushed for a written Declaration of Independence and then after the Revolutionary War was over and he was a commissioner/ambassador from the United States to France and then England while the United States was operating and failing rapidly under the Articles of Confederation he pushed very hard for a bicameral legislative branch so the will of the people could be balanced by the long term good of the nation in the Senate. He was excoriated by Thomas Jefferson whom he'd been friends with if Jefferson ever really had friends for using the English parliment as his model for a legislative branch of government. Jefferson was in love with everything French and only disavowed the French Revolution long after the horrors of madame le gillotine and the reign of terror made it clear that the will of the mob needed to be tempered by cooler more rational minds who yes tended to be more conservative in their actions.  

I come from West Virginia we have barely 3 million citizens. We have three congressional representatives. New York for example has what forty six congressional representatives how could we feel comfortable knowing that we depend soley on the good will of larger states when questions before congress are being decided by large states only and the consequences of those decisions might fall soley upon the smaller states simply because they have essentially no voice in congress because of their small congressional delegations? A bicameral government not only protects the nation from being whipsawed by a very parochial house of representatives but the small states are protected at least somewhat each state being equally represented in the US Senate which is charged with being more concerned with what is best for the country than they are about what may be temporarily best for the citizens in their own states.

5 0
4 years ago
HELPPPPP NOW PLEASE
Oliga [24]
A true i hope this helps <span />
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He was a jamaican-american civil rights activist who was part of the back to africa?? Movement of the early 20th century and fou
8090 [49]

Answer:

The man being described is Marcus Garvey.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The policy of the united states toward the soviet union after world war ii was shaped by:
    6·2 answers
  • What happened after general Benjamin Lincoln marched his troops from Hadley through a snowstorm?
    15·1 answer
  • By whom would the proponents of the great awakening have felt most threatened?
    7·1 answer
  • According to, at what age did Karl Benz start Benz and Company?​
    12·1 answer
  • What Was The End Result Of The Napoleonic Wars On The Countries Involved?
    15·1 answer
  • Why do you think Martineau Was concerned with the morals of the factory owners? Did their morals, or lack there of, contradict a
    15·1 answer
  • What are three american indian tribes that resided in Texas?​
    12·2 answers
  • Why did civilizations first arise along the Fertile Crescent?
    5·1 answer
  • Who wanted to punish the south for is role in starting the long and expensive civil war
    13·2 answers
  • HELPPP RNNNN ASAPPPPPP
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!