1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Reptile [31]
3 years ago
7

Which of the following describes a difference between world war 1 and world war 2​

History
2 answers:
kotykmax [81]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

The First World War (WWI) was fought from 1914 to 1918 and the Second World War (or WWII) was fought from 1939 to 1945. They were the largest military conflicts in human history. Both wars involved military alliances between different groups of countries.

World War I (a.k.a the First World War, the Great War, the War To End All Wars) was centered on Europe. The world warring nations were divided into two groups namely ‘The Central Powers’ and ‘The Allied Powers’. The central powers group consisted of Germany, Austria-Hungary, Turkey and Bulgaria. The Allied powers group consisted of France, Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and (from 1917) the U.S.

World War II (a.k.a the Second World War), the opposing alliances are now referred to as ‘The Axis’ and ‘The Allies’. The Axis group consisted of Germany, Italy, and Japan. The Allies group consisted of France, Britain, the U.S., the Soviet Union, and China. World War II was especially heinous because of the genocide of Jewish people perpetrated by the Nazis

miv72 [106K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

World War II produced more dramatic historical changes.

Explanation:

ape.x

You might be interested in
Explain what the great compromise was? <br><br> Help me please
grin007 [14]

Answer:

July 16, 1987, began with a light breeze, a cloudless sky, and a spirit of celebration. On that day, 200 senators and representatives boarded a special train for a journey to Philadelphia to celebrate a singular congressional anniversary.

Exactly 200 years earlier, the framers of the U.S. Constitution, meeting at Independence Hall, had reached a supremely important agreement. Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architects, Connecticut delegates Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) provided a dual system of congressional representation. In the House of Representatives each state would be assigned a number of seats in proportion to its population. In the Senate, all states would have the same number of seats. Today, we take this arrangement for granted; in the wilting-hot summer of 1787, it was a new idea.

In the weeks before July 16, 1787, the framers had made several important decisions about the Senate’s structure. They turned aside a proposal to have the House of Representatives elect senators from lists submitted by the individual state legislatures and agreed that those legislatures should elect their own senators.

By July 16, the convention had already set the minimum age for senators at 30 and the term length at six years, as opposed to 25 for House members, with two-year terms. James Madison explained that these distinctions, based on “the nature of the senatorial trust, which requires greater extent of information and stability of character,” would allow the Senate “to proceed with more coolness, with more system, and with more wisdom than the popular[ly elected] branch.”

The issue of representation, however, threatened to destroy the seven-week-old convention. Delegates from the large states believed that because their states contributed proportionally more to the nation’s financial and defensive resources, they should enjoy proportionally greater representation in the Senate as well as in the House. Small-state delegates demanded, with comparable intensity, that all states be equally represented in both houses. When Sherman proposed the compromise, Benjamin Franklin agreed that each state should have an equal vote in the Senate in all matters—except those involving money.

Over the Fourth of July holiday, delegates worked out a compromise plan that sidetracked Franklin’s proposal. On July 16, the convention adopted the Great Compromise by a heart-stopping margin of one vote. As the 1987 celebrants duly noted, without that vote, there would likely have been no Constitution.

Explanation:

Hope I helped!

3 0
3 years ago
What was the connection that Angelina Grimké saw between society’s treatment of slaves and of women?
Darina [25.2K]

The Grimké sisters were among the first to explicitly connect race oppression to women’s oppression. Using a Kantian ethical argument that opposes using humans as means rather than as ends in themselves, she noted that historically “woman has been made a means to promote the welfare of man”

She tied the subordination of slaves and women to educational deprivation, noting that both women and slaves been deemed mentally inferior “while being denied the privileges of liberal education”

6 0
3 years ago
What was one effect of reconstruction (1 point)?
castortr0y [4]
One effect of Reconstruction after the Civil War was the improvement of opportunities and rights for the African American population in the U.S. Albeit a slow process, at least there was a beginning to enable the population as a whole to really address some of the horrible effects of slavery. The South rejoined the Union and slowly made progress back to normalcy. Many consider Reconstruction a failure because the changes desired were not as quick to come about.
4 0
4 years ago
How well did wartime Reconstruction experiments work in employing freed African Americans?
ivanzaharov [21]
The experiment worked well, most of them worked in farming other people's land, and once they saved up enough money, they were able to afford land of their own. Hope I helped! (:
3 0
3 years ago
The quote below is from a Declaration of Conscience written by Senator Margaret Chase Smith in the 1950s: "Those of us who shout
Minchanka [31]

The correct answer is McCarthyism.


During the 1950's, America was paranoid about communism spreading into the United States. These fears were escalated thanks to the claims made by Senator Joe McCarthy. McCarthy gave several speeches all over the country talking about how he had a list of communists with the US government, military, and other facets of American life. These claims ruined peoples lifes, as many Americans were forced to report to the House Un-American Activities Committee in order to be questioned by Congress.


This type of bullying and blacklisting individuals was infringing on the rights guaranteed to Americans in the Bill of Rights. This statement is the core argument of Margaret Chase Smith's denunciation of McCarthyism.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did many people leave England and come to the American colonies?
    15·2 answers
  • What 2 things introduced by the Europeans effect Plains Indian hunting and<br> warfare the most?
    8·1 answer
  • Why is the variety of life on Earth now different than it was in Earth’s past?
    7·2 answers
  • The American colonists became more and more unhappy with British rule in the years leading up to the American Revolution. Which
    8·2 answers
  • Should Mao deserve credit or
    15·1 answer
  • The systems that maintains the separation of powers among the branches of the federal
    6·1 answer
  • Which of these details would be relevant
    5·1 answer
  • What is a province?
    7·2 answers
  • How could the need to discover sea routes to India lead to the discovery of the Americans in 1492
    11·1 answer
  • 3. What does "proposition" mean in this phrase: "dedicated to the proposition that all
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!