<span>The space-filling model of a hydrogen molecule would be something like OO , two circles stuck to each other, even squished a little bit. The model for carbon dioxide would be like OOO, with the two circles on the sides a little bigger and squished into the middle circle. </span>
The gravity from the moon and some from the sun brings the tides up, because the moon's gravitational force is strong enough to pull some water up.
Most models can't incorporate all the details of complex natural phenomena. For example, when measuring distances around the Earth it's convenient to model the Earth as a sphere, but this doesn't incorporate variations in distance because of mountain ranges, valleys and other topological features the traveler must traverse. Incorporating these additional details would make the model too complex for easy use. Since models must be simple enough that you can use them to make predictions, they often leave out some of the details.
ALSO.
The conformation of molecules are based on probability. It fails to take into account the electronegativity of individual atoms. And it is ineffective in showing inorganic interactions with metals and such.
A layer of ice on the surface keeps the water temperature warmer than the air temperature.
The answer would be C: The gulf sturgeon population will decline due to loss of habitat
