Answer:
c. $9.50 each.
Explanation:
For computing the selling price, first we have to compute the total price of three cakes which is shown below:
The sale value of three cakes would be
= $3 per cake × 3 cakes
= $9
And, the producer surplus is $19.50
So, the total price of cake equals to
= $9 + $19.50
= $28.50
And, the number of cake is 3
So, the selling price would be
= $28.50 ÷ 3 cakes
= $9.50 each
Bp's expansion plans had been reduced, and its capacity to compete with other large multinational oil companies like Exxon Mobil and ShellExplanation has become restricted.
BP's new cause is reimagining energy for people and our planet. The cause is underpinned by way of an industry-leading ambition – for BP to become a net zero organization by 2050 or faster, and to help the world get to net zero – and this ambition is supported by using 10 goals.
The strong development bp has made over the last few years has reinforced its confidence in the shipping of its earnings and returns goals for 2025. further, it's far now aiming to keep growing EBITDA through to 2030.
It's critical to show BP's graduate recruiters that you percentage BP's five middle values: safety, respect, excellence, one crew, and braveness.
Learn more about Bp's expansion here: brainly.com/question/15043209
#SPJ4
Answer:
1. It is not easy to get funds for a start up, as many banks do not consider it as a successful decision to provide loan to a start up, as the feasibility of recovery of loan cannot be identified and guaranteed.
2. Venture capitalists also faces the same issue as of bank, also they are large equity investors and tend to invest in even larger project.
3. Private investors do not blindly invest and rather are more cautious then banks or venture capitalists, as because they do not huge funds to invest, and with less amount of investment they need even higher assurance.
4. Public stock is never available for a start up as for public stock issue you need great credibility, and good previous record.
Answer:
The correct answer is: Assumption of the risk.
Explanation:
If the risk inherent in a particular action that caused an injury is knowingly and voluntarily assumed, you cannot sue anyone to recover the damages. Suppose, for example, a situation in which he went to a friend's house and was warned about the use of the back door because the floor cover was seriously damaged and would not support a person's weight on it. If you have decided to ignore the warning and use the back door, the doctrine of risk taking will probably prevent the recovery of injuries sustained by a fall on that floor. The court will decide that you "assumed the risk" of such injury.
