A little more detail please. ;)
To be reticent is to not reveal one's thoughts readily. In this case, it is the reticence of the author. The author does not reveal their thoughts readily. If the narrator or author refuses to do something, it is made known that he is doing something. The something here is him refusing. If he acts as if the situation is normal, I'd assume he is acting in such a way that would be nonreactionary of the actions from the provoker. I would safely choose the last option as sorrentino's exercising of authorial reticence.
1) Exposition
2) Rising Action
3) Climax
4) Falling Action
The answer is (C). Creating an outline is a useful tip in the prewriting stage.
Answer:
B. Drawing comparisons.
Explanation:
In the given discussion between Daniel and Jennifer, Daniel is making use of the technique of drawing comparisons between persons. He compares Socrates and Zeus, which he thinks are both fictional or maybe, who knows. And by making that comparison to bring about his own standpoint about the discussion, he presents his take on the issue.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
