Answer:
The correct answer is D. The Antarctic Treaty set Antarctica aside for scientific research.
Explanation:
The Antarctic Treaty was signed on December 1, 1959 in Washington and became effective on June 23, 1961.
Through it, a normative framework was provided in relation to: the peaceful use of Antarctica; cooperation for scientific research; information exchange; the inspection regime for activities carried out in the Antarctic; the status quo of the territorial claims of seven of the signatory countries; and norms and conventions for the conservation of resources and the environment.
The Treaty designates Antarctica as a region of peace and cooperation, also addressing issues related to claims of sovereignty. It establishes that: "in the interest of all humanity, Antarctica will continue to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and will not become the scene or object of international discord".
The Treaty was signed by Argentina, New Zealand, Australia, Norway, Belgium, South Africa, Russia, Chile, France, Great Britain, Japan and the United States.
Here's the answers in order:
-
people's rights
- natural law
- social contract
So the full paragraph would read: Many philosophers wrote down their philosophies about the government and <u>people's rights</u>. A number of philosophers published books on the subject. They applied the idea of <u>natural law</u> to social and political analysis. Thomas Hobbes wrote Leviathan, a book about social structure and government. He wrote about the <u>social contract</u>, an agreement in which the people exchanged some of their individual freedoms for the government’s protection.
Here you go
Explanation:
Societies that rely primarily or exclusively on hunting wild animals, fishing, and gathering wild fruits, berries, nuts, and vegetables to support their diet. Until humans began to domesticate plants and animals about ten thousand years ago, all human societies were hunter-gatherers.
It focuses on protecting individuals and states from tyranny of an unstrained federal government.
Tariff makes the most sense. Embargo is a ban on goods or a country, subsidy is money granted from the government to a business and has nothing to do with trade, quota is a limited amount of a product and again doesn't really have anything to do with trade.
