Answer: A. the company will be willing to pay a different amount for this resource.
Explanation:
The upper limit for the resource was 18 and anything up to 18 would have attracted the same shadow price (price company estimated it was willing to pay for access to this resource).
The access was increased past this limit however to 18.01. The company therefore will now have more access to the resource and so will be willing to pay a different amount for the resource.
Answer:
D)5,000; 7,000
Explanation:
Public is holding 2000 econs and banks reserves are 300 econs. It is mentioned that reserve requirement is 10%.
So total bank deposits must be 3000. Money supply in the economy is (3000 + 2000 = 5000)
When the reserve ratio is 0.1, that means the money multiplier is 10.
If there is an additional inflow of currency because of printing 200 econs by central bank then because of multiplier effect it will be 2000 econs.
Money supply from earlier 5000 econs will become 7000 econs.
Option D is correct.
Answer:
<u>b. False</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
<em>Remember, </em>the term social responsibility in this context refers to an individual doing what would benefit society first, over any gain he may derive if he does otherwise.
For example, we are told that there is "low paying wages in Belize," which means low worker welfare, thus, even if no labor laws were been broken in his country, Olivia has a social responsibility to pay fair prices for the necklaces and earrings.
Answer:
Tariff of 1832
Explanation:
The Tariff of 1832 was enacted to replace the 1828 import tariffs commonly known as Tariffs of Abomination. Most southern states did not like it, but its greatest opposition came from South Carolina since its economy depended greatly in foreign trade. Back then America's largest export was cotton produced by southern states.
Due to South Carolina's extreme opposition, it was replaced by the Compromise Tariff of 1833. This last tariff would gradually decrease the tax rates until they fell back to 1816 levels, which was approximately 20%.
The Nullification Crisis refers to a legal process carried out in South Carolina that determined that federal taxes, specifically import tariffs were unconstitutional and shouldn't apply to them. The problem is that the Supreme Court decides what is unconstitutional or not, not a state court.
