Answer:
c. Loss aversion
Explanation:
Loss aversion is a cognitive bias that explains where there is the pain for losing should be twice as equivalent to the gaining pleasure. It is the tendency of an individual to avoid the losses that purchase the equivalent gains. And, the term that not done the given mistake is the loss aversion
So as per the given situation, the option c is correct
Answer:
27 days
Explanation:
The accrued interest is calculated by beginning the count of days from the dated date of the corporate bond up until the settlement, without including the settlement date.
From 1st June to 27th June, a day before settlement date makes 27 days, as a result, the number of days in respect of which interest is owed to the underwriter is 27 days
This involves bookkeeper obligation, carelessness – or neglecting to distinguish material oversights, and the treatment of bookkeepers acting in compliance with common decency and following the sound accounting standards. The essential inquiry is regardless of whether Shuebke can be held subject expecting she had acted in compliance with common decency and adjusted to the sound accounting standards. To start, sound accounting standards can be characterized as the traditions, guidelines, and methodology used to depict what the worthy bookkeeping standards are at a particular time. They likewise diagram the level of aptitude expected of bookkeepers and the level of care that they should practice in playing out their administrations.
Answer:
$84,500
Explanation:
Data provided as per the question
Net income = $85,000
Depreciation expenses = $1,500
Accounts receivables = $3,000
Increase in accounts payable = $1,000
The computation of amount of cash provided by operating activities is given below:-
Amount of cash provided by operating activities = Net Income + Depreciation expenses - Accounts receivables + Increase in accounts payable
= $85,000 + $1,500 - $3,000 + $1,000
= $84,500
Therefore, for computing the Amount of cash provided by operating activities we simply applied the above formula.
Equilibrium is the intersect of the two curves. The curves show you how much the producers supply and how much the consumers demand at each possible price.
The demand curves shows that the higher the price is, the less the consumers demand. That's obvious—the consumer wants something, but not at any price. He's only willing to pay so much. If the price goes higher and higher, less and less people want to buy the good.
The higher the price is, the more the producers can supply. This is because some producers are able to produce at lower costs; they're better and more efficient than other producers. Other producers, who produce at higher costs, would go bankrupt if they tried to produce at lower prices. But when the price goes up, even the worse producers, who have higher costs, are able to make profit. So, more producers supply to the market.
What happens now, when the price gets lower than the equlibrium? As you can see from the chart, producers would supply less than consumers would be willing to consume at that particular price. There would be SHORTAGE. This happens when the goverment sets price ceilings (like on gas in the 30's). An opposite situation happens when there is price floor—for example minimum wage (because wages are prices too; prices of labor). In that case, there is surplus—in case of minimum wage that means surplus of labor (unemployment).
But when the markets are free to set the price, they will quickly establish equlibrium again. The producers will see that there is a shortage. They'll realize they can set higher prices and make bigger profits. They can't set higher price than the equilibrium though, because there would be surplus and they would have their warehouses stuffed with goods noone wants to buy at that price.
This is the Answer Am 100% sure.
