Answer:
Here answer to the first fill in the blank is money paid and answer for the second fill in the blank is overall sacrifice.
Explanation:
Here Eddie has perceived price as money paid for the purchase of his favorite beverage, he is ready to drive 30 miles for this beverage , just because he is saving a dollar on it, so from the Eddie's point view , driving 30 miles to get the beverage is worth it . But as per the most of the customers , Eddie is making an overall sacrifice by driving 30 miles to get the beverage , just because he is saving dollar on it, so from the most customers point of view , driving 30 miles is not worth it and a lot of sacrifice is being made.
Answer:
B. $24,000.
Explanation:
The computation of the depreciation per units under the units-of-production method is shown below:
= (Original cost - residual value) ÷ (estimated production units)
= ($180,000 - $20,000) ÷ (40,000 units)
= ($160,000) ÷ (40,000 units)
= $4 per unit
Now for the second year, it would be
= Production units in second year × depreciation per unit
= 6,000 units × $4
= $24,000
Answer: 1: standard cost of total helmets $15,680
2:
Explanation:
See attached file
Take value of the home $210,000
Subtract his balance of 160,000
Leaves you with 50,000
50% of 50,000= 25,000
Answer: B. Tabitha figures that the additional benefit of having her own booth ( as opposed to sharing) is at least $300.
Explanation:
When Tabitha moved booths, she began to pay $450 per month. The difference between this cost and the cost she was previously paying is:
= 450 - 150
= $300
If Tabitha is paying $300 extra, it must mean that the benefit she is getting from being in her own booth is at least $300 because that would be the only way she would not be making a loss. Were the benefits anything less than $300, she would be making a loss and it would not make any sense for her to continue renting the booth.