1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sergij07 [2.7K]
3 years ago
6

In Article I, Section 10, Clause 3, states are forbidden from keeping a standing army or navy. Why would the Constitution restri

ct a state from "keeping a standing army"?
This restriction is meant to prevent the states from assuming powers that the Constitution grants to the national government.

Supporting an army and navy is a difficult financial burden for a single state.

The states might use the army to overthrow the federal government.

State and federal armies would compete for limited resources.
History
1 answer:
kiruha [24]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Option A is the right answer.

Explanation:

The constitution was implemented in such a manner that no state shall impinge upon the centralized powers of the Union Government.

Founding fathers have prohibited the use of standing army during the time of peace as it would affect the liberty of the nation. Federalists feared that the states would become tyrannical if the standing army is allowed by it. Hence, the founding fathers have mentioned in the constitution that the congress have the powers to raise money and appropriate funds for standing army for not more than two years.  

Anti-federalist favored standing army as it would safeguard the security of the citizens. But federalists felt that it would alarm the liberty and freedom of the nation and hence constitution allowed standing army but only during the time of peace it must be disbanded.

You might be interested in
Explain what point you think the cartoonist was making.
Ghella [55]

Answer:

is that the peasant are lower class people they get no respect from the rich

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Was the bursum bill for or against Native American rights
SpyIntel [72]
It was against Native American rights.
8 0
2 years ago
Under the rule of King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella of Spain, the policy of punishment against non-Christians was called the
Anastasy [175]

Answer:

Explanation:

dd

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“The most effective form of government is ____________ because ___________________________________________.”
Sergio [31]
The most effective form of government is U.S senate. To compare against that of Julius Caesar’s governing tactics, the Senate represents democracy and power in the hands of the people, rather than a single dictator making decisions for the masses.
5 0
2 years ago
What was the password for the Battle of<br>Trenton?​
Vladimir [108]

Answer:

Victory or Death“. Those words would be the password for the surprise attack.

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did John Quincy Adams treat native Americans
    15·1 answer
  • Select all that apply. Advantages to the United States brought about by corporations included: more workers employed lower price
    9·1 answer
  • Ptolemy influenced Western civilization because of his ____ ?
    5·1 answer
  • At the onset of WWII all of the following countries fall to the Nazi’s except a. Poland c. Spain b. France d. Czechoslovakia
    9·2 answers
  • I need help with this another 20 points
    13·1 answer
  • The significance of the Pequot war of 1637 was that:
    8·1 answer
  • In saying that he wanted “peace without victory,” President Wilson demonstrated that he was a(n) realist. idealist. tough negoti
    6·2 answers
  • The colonists built their governments based on customs and ideas borrowed from England and early civilizations, including unwrit
    12·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the Vietnamization policy?
    7·2 answers
  • What challenges did the early English settlers face?
    6·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!