Answer:
expertise
Explanation:
The answer is -- "expertise"
A government official who is expert in any field will perform his or her duty or tasks efficiently and properly. This is very important for the development of the society and the country. An expert official with come up with quick and intelligent solutions to the social problems in the society.They will be focused on their on their work and will result a good modern and bureaucratized democracy.
Thus the most important characteristics for a government official in a modern, bureaucratized democracy is "expertise".
Answer:
id
Explanation:
Cookie Monster has an intense urge to consume cookies, even when doing so is irrational and maladaptive. Eating cookies gives Cookie Monster a great source of pleasure and satisfaction. Freud would say that his behavior reflects the fact that Cookie Monster is ruled by his ____id___.
As indicated by Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic hypothesis of character, the id is the character part made up of oblivious mystic vitality that attempts to fulfill essential urges, needs, and wants. The id works dependent on the delight standard, which requests prompt satisfaction of requirements.
In this case, by eating cookies, Cookie Monster satisfies his desire of consuming them and takes pleasure and satisfaction.
The best and most correct answer among the choices provided by your question is the second choice or letter B.
Line graphs could be used to <span>represent the differences in size between two variables.</span>
I hope my answer has come to your help. Thank you for posting your question here in Brainly. We hope to answer more of your questions and inquiries soon. Have a nice day ahead!
Research on <u>"the fundamental attribution error" </u>suggests it is <u>"common"</u> for people to assume that dispositions are the underlying causes of most behaviors.
The fundamental attribution error is our tendency to clarify somebody's conduct in light of inward factors, for example, identity or air, and to think little of the impact that outside variables, for example, situational impacts, have on someone else's conduct. We may, for instance, clarify the way that somebody is jobless in view of his character, and point the finger at him for his predicament, when in certainty he was as of late laid off because of a lazy economy. Obviously, there are times when we're right about our suspicions, however the key attribution blunder is our inclination to clarify the conduct of others in light of character or air. This is especially obvious when the conduct is negative.
