1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gulaghasi [49]
3 years ago
11

Connie, a single mother and home-business entrepreneur, enjoys running her own business. However, because she is busy balancing

work and family, she does not foresee her home business growing significantly in the near future. Connie can best be described as what type of entrepreneur?
Business
1 answer:
VladimirAG [237]3 years ago
7 0

Connie can best be described as Solo Operator type of entrepreneur.

Explanation:

Connie is a single mother who works from home on her small business which is her primary source of income but is ridden by the work of house and work which makes her unable to expand her business as she cannot invest enough time in it.

This is happening because she is a sole operator as in she has to take all the decisions and do all the work by herself with no additional help from anyone else whatsoever in the family or the work front either.

You might be interested in
Major Manuscripts, Inc.
Lisa [10]

Answer:

Projected total assets = <u>$10,318 </u>

Projected retained earnings = <u>$4,675.30 </u>

Additional new debt required = <u>$537.70</u>

Explanation:

external financing needed = EFN = [(total assets/total sales) x ($ Δ sales)] - [(total current liabilities/total sales) x ($ Δ sales)] - [profit margin x forecasted sales in $ x (1 - dividend payout ratio)]

total assets = $9,380, projected total assets = $9,380 x 1.1 = $10,318

total sales = $7,800

$ Δ sales = $780

current liabilities = $1,550

profit margin = net income / sales = $410 / $7,800 = 0.052564

forecasted sales = $7,800 x 1.1 = $8,580

dividends payout ratio = dividends / net income = $187 / $410 = 0.4561

EFN = [($9,380/$7,800) x ($780)] - [($1,550/$7,800) x ($780)] - [0.052564 x $8,580 x (1 - 0.4561)]

EFN = $938 - $155 - $245.30 = $537.70

projected retained earnings = current retained earnings - projected net income - projected dividends = $4,430 + $451 - $205.70 = $4,675.30

6 0
3 years ago
A rent ceiling set below the equilibrium rent
Anna [14]

A rent ceiling set below the equilibrium rent creates a situation in which the quantity demanded of housing is greater than quantity supplied.

<u>Option: C</u>

<u>Explanation:</u>

Rent limit is the highest price a property owner can demand for rent. Rent ceilings are typically fixed by legislation and limit how high the rent can be in a given area. Although, the amount of affordable housing is also reduced as a consequence of this rule, as tenants are not interested in renting out their properties at a cheap price.

Nevertheless, if the limit is placed underneath the level of equilibrium then a reduction of deadweight is produced. Many issues come in the form of illegal markets, scanning time and charges that aren't leased precisely like key money i.e. high initial cost for new keys.

4 0
3 years ago
ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the
Ymorist [56]

Answer:

ERIC: Hi, Hubert. This is my first economics course, and many of the concepts discussed in class are really confusing. Today the professor explained that the true cost of going to college includes both the tuition I pay as well as something called the "opportunity cost" of going to college. I don't understand. I pay $32,000 per year in tuition. The tuition is what I pay to the school, so it seems like that should be my true cost!

HUBERT: Hi, Eric. Many concepts in economics can be confusing at first. Let's talk it through.

Economists think of costs a bit differently than just the dollar amount that you pay. To an economist, the true cost of college includes the total value of what you give up in order to acquire your college education. In other words, not only did you give up the tuition money that you paid, but by attending college, you gave up opportunities to do other things with your time as well. This is where the idea of opportunity cost comes from.

The opportunity cost of your decision to go to college is the value of the next best alternative that you gave up. Suppose that your next best alternative to college is to work as a cashier. By not going to college, and taking this job, you could earn $16,000 per year. Then your opportunity cost of college is <u>$16,000</u>, and your total cost of a year of college is <u>$48,000</u> per year.

ERIC: I think I get it now. So when I take into account the opportunity cost of college, the true cost is actually <u>more </u>than just the tuition.

HUBERT: Correct. Thinking about costs in this way will help you make more rational decisions in your everyday life. Now tell me, how can you explain your decision to go to college?

ERIC: I chose to go to college because, for me, the value of a year in college <u>gives me a higher stand and offers me a better long-term opportunity that someone without a college degree.</u>

Explanation:

The question poses a discussion about the opportunity cost of attending college. The understanding behind this is that by choosing to go to college, Eric is forfeiting the opportunity to get a job as a cashier that would earn him $16,000 a year while incurring his college fees of $32,000. Therefore, the total cost of attending college to him should be $48,000.

3 0
3 years ago
Suppose that when disposable income decreases by $2,000, consumption spending increases by $1500. Given this information, we kno
sdas [7]

Answer:

the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75

Explanation:

The computation of the marginal propensity to consume is shown below:

MPC = Change in consumption ÷Change in disposable income

where,

The Change  in consumption is 1500

ANd, the Change in disposable income is 2000

So,

MPC is

= $1,500 ÷ $2,000

= 0.75

hence, the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75

4 0
3 years ago
4. Trade policies Tariffs and quotas do which of the following? Benefit domestic producers of the protected good and harm domest
irina [24]

Answer:

Benefit domestic producers of the protected good and harm domestic consumers of the protected good.

Explanation:

Trade policies tariffs and quotas benefit domestic producers of the protected good and harm domestic consumers of the protected good as they're made to pay for the consumption of imported products. Hence, under free trade there are more societal benefits due to the specialization of domestic goods.

Tariffs can reduce both the volume of exports and imports in a country.

In order to generate revenues, domestic government make use of tariffs while quotas do not generate any revenue for them.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Zen Corp, an Australian company, and Pluto Inc, an American company, entered into a one-time contract to build an elevated expre
    14·1 answer
  • Cesar claims he found a definite way to save money, "Buy direct from the manufacturer. Any time intermediaries get involved, you
    7·1 answer
  • BUSINE
    6·1 answer
  • Joan is a single individual who works for Big Petroleum, Inc. During all of 2019, she is stationed in West Africa. She pays West
    6·1 answer
  • ¿Por qué implantar el DO en una organización?
    7·1 answer
  • The fact that more than one type of economic system exists in the world today is attributable MAINLY to the fact that
    11·1 answer
  • Assume the following information for Splish Brothers Corp.
    8·1 answer
  • What type of Businesses has limited liability ?
    12·1 answer
  • The common stock of Dayton Repair sells for $43.19 a share. The stock is expected to pay $2.20 per share next year when the annu
    15·1 answer
  • Anyone finna be friends with me
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!