1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Brums [2.3K]
4 years ago
14

Many Civil War records are letters written by soldiers, government officials, former slaves, and women. Such writings from the t

ime period are primary sources. What can Civil War letters tell you about life during the war and what was happening in the country? Why do you think historians regard these letters as important primary sources for this time period? Provide your answer in 100–125 words.
History
2 answers:
zimovet [89]4 years ago
5 0
Well the letters from the civil war would show us what kind of condition the slaves we’re living in how hard it much have been and, for the women who and sons and husbands who were fighting in the war and how hard that must have been for them to deal with. Historians regard these letters as an important primary source for that time period because there isn’t much to go off of and letters shows a direct point of view of what had happened during that time and how slaves and most likely how women were treated like. (I suck at saying this but does it make sense?)
yanalaym [24]4 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The American Civil War began in 1861, lasted until 1865, and was ruinous by any standard. Within months of President Lincoln’s inauguration, seven southern states began the secession from the Union and declared the Confederate States of America. This split in the fabric of the country began a bitter war, concluding in the death of more than 750,000 soldiers. When the South finally surrendered, the Confederacy collapsed, and slavery was abolished. To understand the conflict, take a look back at the primary documents that highlight decisions of generals, the everyday drudgery of soldiers, and the photographic images of battle.

Letters reveal a lot about the writers and the time during which they were written. They relate the writer’s thoughts, feelings, and experiences. Letters written during the Civil War describe the hardships faced by the people at home and in the war. For example, a letter by a soldier might talk about his fears, his daily life, and his hope for returning home. A formerly enslaved person's letter might describe his life after slavery and his hope to reunite with family, start a new life, or join the Union army. These letters help historians understand how people at the time saw the events around them and how they were affected by those events. For that reason, the letters are viewed as important primary sources.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Which of these men was president of the united states at the beginning of world war i?
Paha777 [63]
Woodrow Wilson...........................................................................................


6 0
3 years ago
Latin, the language of ancient Rome, lives on in
kogti [31]

Vatican City, located in Rome.

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement best summarizes the global depression?
yawa3891 [41]
The answer is C. 
Hope this helps! Or helps someone in the future.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Briefly describe the policies European nations used to gain control of Muslim Lands. Will brainlist
mote1985 [20]

Answer:

Explanation:

The Europeans used a number of policies and methods to gain control of Muslim Lands:

Superior Military Power: The Europeans had military technologies that were significantly more advanced than anything in the arsenals of all of the Islamic States (with the exception of the Ottoman Empire). As a result, they were able to massacre any army sent to impose their colonial expeditions.

Treaties with Local Rulers: Several colonizers, the British especially, preferred to leave the conquered Islamic Empires in charge of their domains since they already had a number of ministers and officials on the local levels in the various territories. The colonizers would then dictate what the Islamic Empire would need to do and the state would comply in order to remain in what little power and luxury they still had.

Protection of Minorities: Christians, Jews, and other religious minorities were in a terrible position in the Islamic World prior to colonial arrival, where they were forced to pay additional taxes and unable to actively take part in governmental affairs. In the colonial system, all indigenous inhabitants were equal. Christians and Jews took the opportunity to ascend to higher ranks in government, receive superior Western eduction, and become entrepreneurs under the colonial auspices. As a result, these minorities became staunchly protective of the colonizers since they had essentially liberated them.

White Man's Burden: Many Europeans were persuaded by the writings of Rudyard Kipling and John Stuart Mills (and others) that there was only one true trajectory for human civilization and that the Europeans were simply farther along that trajectory than the citizens of the colonial empires. Therefore, it was incumbent on the European since he was so much further along, to push the non-European States into the Modern Era. This view was seen by most in the colonized territories to be insulting to their own culture and beliefs.

Divide and Conquer: Relatively straightforward, the Europeans would draw borders arbitrarily to prevent one ethnic group from being able to unite entirely against the colonizers and would include multiple ethnic groups with animosity towards each other to be in the same colonial borders to prevent them from working together for independence. A good example of the first would be the Baloch in British India and Persia. A good example of the second would be the Acehnese and Balinese in Indonesia.

4 0
3 years ago
Why might some communist nations have adopted market principles after the fall of the Soviet Union?
Vladimir [108]
The government system of the Soviet Union during Cold War was communism, which basically abolishes the right of an individual to own a private property. This means that the government has the sole control in all of its resources, thus a greater chance of accumulating and safe-keeping of wealth. Furthermore, during those times war among nations was already at a set off so there was a need to advance their artillery system and other equipment needed to armed themselves in case of attacks. Therefore, most of their resources went to defense spending. 

This lead to the understanding among the Soviet Union's people that the current government system was already  inefficient and is not viable to sustain the needs of their country. People then demanded a change.
4 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the French and British differ in their efforts to gain control in North America ?
    9·1 answer
  • Was Hitler's power in Europe was seriously checked when the United States entered the war.
    15·1 answer
  • If people in court say, "I plead the fifth," that means they
    13·2 answers
  • Who was president as American society exploded into cauldron of movements, riots, protests, and war
    14·1 answer
  • Which colonial leader helped found Maryland as a place where Catholics could settle? A. James Oglethorpe B. John Winthrop C. Rog
    7·1 answer
  • PLZ HELP!!!!!!!! 30 POINTS!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • What in Muhammad's background may have influenced his acceptance of monotheism?
    11·1 answer
  • Adolf hitler was able to convince fellow germans that the jews were bad and should be killed because
    8·1 answer
  • "Political Meeting of the Future"
    6·2 answers
  • Witch statement best explains why the northern states most likley favored tariffs on foreign goods
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!