Below are the differences between Bentham’s and Mill’s respective versions of utilitarianism:
1. The qualitative distinction
Bentham pots concede to any distinction in propensities yet
Mill arranged human inclinations and by ethical news of subjective contrast
called some honorable and another base. Along these lines, it is said that
scholarly propensities are far better than physiological inclinations.
2. Qualitative distinction in pleasures:
Similarly, Mill made subjective refinements in various joys. As indicated
by Bentham, all delights are comparable. In the event that the amount of joy is
the same, at that point, there is no distinction amongst verse and pushpin. As
opposed to this, as indicated by Mill, 'It is ideal to be a person disappointed
than a pig fulfilled, better to be a Socrates disappointed than a trick
fulfilled.
Answer:
hope this helps
They must be a person qualified to be appointed as a Judge of the Supreme Court. Hence, they must have been a judge of some high court for five years or an advocate of some high court for ten years.
A presidential candidate promotes a "campaign platform" during the campaign, the goals of which generally transfer the goals into the "presidential agenda".
Our Father who art in Heaven,
Holy be thy name,
Thy Kingdom come
Thy will be done on Earth as it is in Heaven
Give us this day, our daily bread,
And forgive us our sins,
As we forgive those,
Who sin against us,
Do not bring us to the test
But deliever us from evil,
Amen.
I am not sure about this
