Answer:
each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss
Explanation:
Based on the scenario being described within the question it can be said that the each policy will pay $25,000 of the loss. This is an equal share for each policy and is due to them having the pro rata liability clause. This clause states that a policy is only liable for an equal percentage of the loss if the insurer has other policies from other companies. As in this case.
Answer:
The answer is <u>"$110 billion".</u>
Explanation:
Firms increase their investment by $11 billion
mpc = 0.9
gdp = ?
To find the gdp, first we have to find expenditure multiplier;
we will find that by using the formula;
expenditure multiplier = 1/(1-0.9) = 1/0.1 = 10
Now gdp = 10 x $11 billion
= $110 billion
Thus the <u>gdp is $110 billion.</u>
Answer:
cost of equity = 12.16 %
Explanation:
given data
annual dividend of $3.73
increases dividend = 3.40 percent annually
stock price = $43.96 per share
to find out
What is the company's cost of equity
solution
we will use here Gordon model for compute company's cost of equity that is
market value = 
........................1
put here value we get
43.96 = 
solve it we get
cost of equity = 0.121735
cost of equity = 12.16 %
Answer:
Availability of data.
Explanation:
The term “data availability” refers to the ability to ensure that required data is always accessible when and where needed within an organization's IT infrastructure, even when disruptions occur.
Answer:
Please check the answer below
Explanation:
a. One issue is the "locking-in" of assets. If I hold shares of Corporation X, then I can delay paying taxes as long as I don't sell. Effectively, I get to keep all of the interest/dividend payments on my tax liability. However, if I discover that X is really a poor investment and Corporation Y is better, then selling X and buying Y means that I have to pay taxes. This might discourage me from making a switch to a more profitable/efficient investment decision. This is the "locking-in" effect.
b. A short-run cut might cause many people to sell stocks that they had felt "locked-in" with. The penalty for switching is smaller, so more people will do it -- resulting in a great deal of cap gains tax revenue collected.
c. Taxing realized gains, even when the stock is not sold, rather than just accrued gains would eliminate this locking-in effect. Investors would not be penalized for switching to a better investment, and long-term capital gains revenue (as well as efficiency) would rise.
