1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lubasha [3.4K]
3 years ago
12

Both James I and Charles I of England believed in __________. parliamentary supremacy absolute rule religious toleration rule by

the middle class
History
1 answer:
Debora [2.8K]3 years ago
5 0
Base on the question that ask to choose among the following choices that states what both James I and Charles I of England believed in and base on my research, I would say that the answer would be that the both believe in parliamentary supremacy. I hope you are satisfied with my answer and feel free to ask for more 
You might be interested in
Solve for x.<br> x = 0.6 =9.3
almond37 [142]

x = 9.9

How? Well, let's break it down simply.

Your initial equation was x = 0.6 + 9.3.

First, we simplify both sides of the equation, and combine like terms.

0.6 + 9.3 = 9.9

Thus, x = 9.9.

8 0
3 years ago
How did reformer Jane Addams try to correct the ills of industrialization?
mr Goodwill [35]
Jane Addams try to correct the ills of industrialization was when her <span>ran settlement houses which served poor residents. (immigrants/women). 

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly. I hope the answer will help you. Feel free to ask more questions.
</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following resources was transported from the East to the
Assoli18 [71]

Answer:

Hello, Your answer will be A) Minerals

<em>Have a Great Day!</em>

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP
torisob [31]

Answer:

At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

There is a lot of truth in this summary, but it is also simplistic. There is no doubt that Native Americans suffered enormously at the hands of white Americans, but federal Indian policy was shaped as much by paternalism, however misguided, as by white greed. Nor were Indians simply passive victims of white Americans’ actions. Their responses to federal policies, white Americans’ actions and the fundamental economic, social and political changes of the twentieth century were varied and divisive. These tensions and cross-currents are clearly evident in the history of the Indian New Deal and the policy of termination that replaced it in the late 1940s and 1950s. Native American history in the mid-twentieth century was much more than a simple story of good and evil, and it raises important questions (still unanswered today) about the status of Native Americans in modern US society.

Explanation:

Plz give me brainliest worked hard

8 0
3 years ago
Identify one factor that led to the downfall of land based empires in the era of 1450-1750.
poizon [28]

Answer:

Imperial expansion in Europe and Asia resulted from the increased use of gunpowder, cannons, and armed trade to establish large empires. Most of the groups that were conquered were weak or disorganized. These land based empires included the Manchu in Central East Asia, the Mughal in South and Central Asia, the Ottoman in Southern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. The rulers centralized their power over politics, religion and the military. They also controlled trade, enriching the rulers, who created cultural monuments and stronger militaries.

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What innovation did johann Gutenberg introduce to Europe in the 1450s
    9·1 answer
  • I need synonyms for these words
    10·1 answer
  • The extensive exchange of plants and animals between the Old and New World *
    10·2 answers
  • idenitfy the most significant factor contributing to the challenges facing modern native Americans in new Mexico.give to reasons
    12·1 answer
  • How did Muslim scholars help preserve learning from the ancient world
    11·2 answers
  • What is the difference between a manifest function and a latent function?
    10·2 answers
  • According to the excerpt, what is one purpose for
    14·2 answers
  • Beijing was freed from warlord control in 1928. using the map key, determine how long, at the most, beijing's freedom lasted and
    10·2 answers
  • Supporters of the Constitution agreed to add a bill of rights in order to... a) win ratification of the Constitution. b) support
    10·2 answers
  • Compare and contrast asexual and sexual reproduction. Mention at least TWO similarities and THREE differences
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!