Answers:
- The Congress of Vienna
- They wanted to restore peace and stability in Europe
Explanation:
The Congress of Vienna was a gathering of leaders from the European nations that had defeated France and Napoleon -- and France was allowed representation also. (The French Minister of Foreign Affairs, Charles Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord, had a role there. )
The delegates of the Congress of Vienna were interested in creating a balance of power in European politics. They did not want one nation to become too powerful again and press beyond its borders as France had done under Napoleon. The Congress of Vienna emphasized also the principal of "legitimacy" -- trying to put rulers in power that they thought to be the legitimate rulers of nations. (So, for instance, the Bourbon monarchy was restored in France.) They sought to prevent revolutions and unrest from breaking out again ... but it would only be a couple decades before further revolutions did occur.
N/A
A. unable to both be true at the same time.
A. one that inspires fear , panic or horror
A. oil production.
D. arabian sea , red sea , and caspian sea.
<span>On August 7, 1807, Robert Fulton's Clermont went from New York to Albany to make history with a 150-mile trip.</span>
Answer:
The answer is the cotton farms were dominating the southern economy.
Explanation:
King Cotton was a popular term used in antebellum south, mostly due to the fact that cotton dominated the southern economy. The slaves worked hard in cotton plantation bringing prosperity and economy growth to the south.
Answer:
The US Supreme Court’s decision fair and benevolent to Dred Scott and his family is described below in complete detail.
Explanation:
The Dred Scott judgment was the U.S. Supreme Court's judgment on March 6, 1857, that has existed in a free state and region did not authorize a slave character, Dred Scott, to his independence.
They dictated that African Americans, whether they were slaves or had parents who were slaves, had no constitutional avenue in court. They believed that the Missouri Compromise was illegal. In the cores of the court, Dred Scott had no constitutional right to demand his freedom.
