Answer:A. A number of countries used it as an opportunity to fight Great
Britain
Explanation:
Answer:
During the 14th and 15th centuries in Italy, a new artistic and philosophical movement emerged: the Reinaissance. This movement was opposed to many of the norms of the Medieval Era, and took after Classical Antiquity instead.
To Italian thinkers and artists of the time, taking a leap back to Classical Antiquity was attractive because Italy itself had been for centuries, the center of the Mediterranean word as the main province of the Roman Empire. These thinkers felt that the cultural achivements of the Classical Era were superior to those of the Medeival Era.
One of the important building or structure of the Indus Valley Civilisation was 'The Great Bath'. It is one of the well known structure of the time and the said civilisation
all children should have to attend school
Answer: there are many forms of communism and fascism (!!!) Italian fascism is not the same as English or Romanian fascism. Differences exist especially in theory, ideology, doctrine. When we move to practice and regime as it works in reality, there are few differences (for example: Communism should be theoretically open to all people without discriminating race....in the USSR Jews were discriminated). So description of differences will be purely theoretical:
1) fascism is born around 1900 whereas Communism came into existence (as a theory) already in 1848 (Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx).
2) Communism has its central authority (Karl Marx)....all the rest is derived from his thought. Fascism lacks that....it is a nebulous plurality of authors, mixture of ideas.
3) Communism is product of Enlightenment (primacy of reason, idea of progress, just society etc.) whereas fascism is a produt of Anti-Enlightenment (irrationalism, primacy of ancestry or race, belief in the soul of nation, sometimes necessity of exceptional leading elite, frequently is linked with some almost religious faith, cult of body, physical strength, very patriarchal, references to Middle Ages).
Explanation: similarities....both were born in times where masses were entering politics and both needs masses. Both preach man of masses. They do not promote individuality, individuality is suppressed.
