1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zaharov [31]
4 years ago
10

The idea that courts should not be heavily involved in lawmaking, but rather should only rule in cases where the constitutionali

ty is clear is known as a. judicial restraint. b. judicial activism. c. judicial reform. d. judicial review.
Social Studies
1 answer:
Virty [35]4 years ago
7 0

Answer: judicial restraint

Explanation:

Judicial restraint is a theory of judicial interpretation that encourages judges to limit the exercise of their own power. It asserts that judges should hesitate to strike down laws unless they are obviously unconstitutional, though what counts as obviously unconstitutional is itself a matter of some debate. Judicial restraint is sometimes regarded as the opposite of judicial activism. In deciding questions of constitutional law, judicially restrained jurists go to great lengths to defer to the legislature. Judicially restrained judges respect stare decisis, the principle of upholding established precedent handed down by past judges

You might be interested in
What does "apartheid" mean in Afrikaans?
Vadim26 [7]
D I think I just had a similar question
5 0
4 years ago
Explain what you have learned about the events of September 11, 2001 in an essay of about two hundred words.
Readme [11.4K]

Answer:

The hijacked Flight 11 was crashed into floors 93 to 99 of the North Tower (1 WTC) at 8:46 a.m. The hijacked Flight 175 struck floors 77 to 85 of the South Tower (2 WTC) 17 minutes later at 9:03 a.m. When the towers were struck, between 16,400 and 18,000 people were in the WTC complex.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Clear selection
alukav5142 [94]

Answer:

Montezuma "sorry if its wrong"

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Free-riders are individuals that benefit from a service, but do not contribute to the service directly.
Elan Coil [88]

Answer:

i believe it would be, true

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is meant by dual court system?
juin [17]
The US has a dual court system in that it has state courts and federal courts<span>.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Drawing conclusions about every woman who leases a car in a particular zip code from a representative sample of 250 women in tha
    5·1 answer
  • Pericles was a famous leader from ancient Athens. Pericles once said that Athens was a democracy because
    6·1 answer
  • Which are examples of education reforms in the mid-1800s?
    13·1 answer
  • Explain how an absolute monarchy differs from a dictatorship.
    12·1 answer
  • Genocide is a process that develops in ten stages that are predictable but not unstoppable. At each stage, preventive measures c
    12·1 answer
  • Which method of judicial selection leads to the highest degree of judicial responsiveness?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of federalism?
    11·1 answer
  • How is sam houston remebered
    9·2 answers
  • Describe the historical background and contribution of red cross​
    9·1 answer
  • what type of conflict does the passage illustrate?character vs. selfcharacter vs. charactercharacter vs. societycharacter vs. na
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!