Question: In a group discussion, which of these is the best example of challenging the credibility of a source?
Options:
A. Readers of John Milton's paradise lost often search for a hero in the form of a character, which is fruitless.
B. Iku Saito argues that homer was the greatest writer of Epics, but it’s a common flaw to call the first the greatest.
C. Alex Fernandez's interpretation of J.D. Salinger's The Catcher in the Rye is interesting but ultimately flawed.
D. Henry Taylor's argument seems to be developing but his essay is an unfinished thesis, not a published article.
Answer: The correct answer is option <u>B) Iku Saito argues that homer was the greatest writer of Epics, but it's a common flaw to call the first the greatest.</u>
Explanation: The credibility of a source can be questioned or challenged based on the lack of evidence given. In the example given above, the person is questioning or challenging the credibility of Homer actually being the greatest writer if epics. He mentions that even though he was the first writer in epics, that doesn't make him the best.
i don't what you mean by, fragment-punctuated-correctly, but it is not "let's" because let's mean "let is" so that sentence would be punctuated incorrectly
The outward looks cannot be used to judge a person's character.
Explanation:
The story involves the wise teacher by the name Buddha who tries to help a old woman. In fact, the readers will be introduced to the fact that Buddha guides the old woman into discovering for herself the answers that she is seeking. As the story turned, she was looking for the wrong thing.
