What was McDuffie's economic argument for slavery

Social Studies

2 answers:

Marta_Voda [28]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

In 1835, Governor of South Carolina George McDuffie in his famous speech he act as a defender of slavery in economic terms.

1. He argued the sudden end of slavery will lead to falling off the economy of the south which was founded based on slavery.

2. He further argued, If all the slaves were freed it will lead to widespread unemployment and bloodshed in the entire region fall in the state of "anarchy" (stateless society).

3. He further argued, In the bible also Abraham had slaves therefore, slavery existed since the history of mankind.

klasskru [66]3 years ago

4 0

"Defenders of slavery argued that the sudden end to the slave economy would have had a profound and killing economic impact in the South where reliance on slave labor was the foundation of their economy."

You might be interested in

Despite the fact that her son died 10 years ago, Helena has such an intense yearning to have him back alive that she is unable t

mariarad [96]

Answer: complicated

Explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

N this activity type, you’re asked questions solely or primarily to help you learn something.

Daniel [21]

Answer:

formative quizzing

Explanation:

The formative questionnaires present questions that are not intended to test an individual, but rather to present concepts and information that can extend and help the student's process of understanding about a certain subject. This type of questionnaire is built taking into account the needs that the student presents with regard to academic knowledge hurting the classes, or to concepts that are presented in a more complex way.

3 0

3 years ago

Compare and contrast the three most common research methods. Which approach would you select in an attempt to better understand

Fiesta28 [93]

Answer:

Naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies

Explanation:

Three of the most common research methods are naturalistic observation, interviews, and case studies. Each one of them brings something different to the table:

Naturalistic observation refers to studying subjects directly on their environment without any intervention from the researcher. This is a great method because watching people behave in a natural way will be very revealing and more truthful. When subjects know they are being observed, they often change their behaviour. Naturalistic observation thus requires the observer to be as anonymous and invisible as possible.
An interview is a research method where the subject is asked to answer to some specific questions crafted by the researcher. Interviews allow the researchers have a much closer look at the subject, trying to ascertain the motives behind their behaviour. However, a problem with interviews is that the subjects often time won't respond truthfully, but will adjust their answers to what is expected from them.
A case study is a method that goes more in depth than the other two, and the researcher tries to learn as much as possible about the subject through a variety of other methods, like observations, interviews, surveys, etc. Case studies are much thorough and deeper investigations, but they can be very time consuming, and require a subject that is willing to facilitate the work of the researcher, which isn't always possible.

8 0

3 years ago

What does this quote mean? Please give an example

mixer [17]

Answer:

I think it means,"become a better version of your self"

7 0

2 years ago

What group opposed British forces in Lexington?

kirill [66]

British forces were opposed by the forces from the Thirteen Colonies, or the colonies; of whom there were below 80. Many are known by name, such as John Parker and William Heath,

7 0

3 years ago