7/6
The slope of the equation in the form y=Mx+c is m
Parallel lines have Same gradient
Which makes gradient 7/6
Please mark as brainliest
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
--- not more than
spending
Solving (a): Represent as an inequality
Not more than means <
So, the inequality is:
Solving (b): The first two possible solutions
These are the numbers closest to 150 i.e. 149 and 148
Hence, 
Answer:
A.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the two points (2,7) and (4,-1). In order to determine the linear equation, we need to find the slope and the y-intercept. First, find the slope <em>m.</em> Let (2,7) be x1 and y1, and let (4,-1) be x2 and y2:
Thus, the slope is -4.
Now, to find the y-intercept, we can use the point-slope form. Recall that the point slope form is:
Where (x1, y1) is a coordinate pair and m is the slope.
Use either of the two coordinate pair. I'm going to use (2,7). Substitute them for x1 and y1, respectively:
This is also slope-intercept form. The answer is A.
log(3x) = log(2x-4)
taking antilog of both sides:
3x = 2x - 4
3x - 2x = -4 [subtracting 2x from both sides]
x = -4
and we're done already!
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Find the complete question
Zelie planned for a square pool to have a side length of 28 ft but found that it needs to be 14 ft long to fit in her backyard. She found the change of scale below.
Which is Zelie’s error?
Zelie should have divided both numbers by 14.
Zelie should have written the ratio as 28/7.
Zelie should have written the ratio as 14/8.
Zelie should have subtracted 14 from both numbers.
Original length of pool = 28ft
If he found that it need to be 14ft longer then the actual measure = 14th
given equation is;
(28 - 7)/14 - 7 = 14/7
Scale constant = original length/actual length
Scale constant = 28/14
Scale constant = 2
Hence the scale constant is 2
According to the option, Zelei should have divided both numbers by 14.
