1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Korvikt [17]
3 years ago
14

According to Acts 6:5, Stephen was a man full of the Holy Spirit and:

History
2 answers:
emmasim [6.3K]3 years ago
6 0
Yes, he was.. Can you rephrase what you need help on?
Rina8888 [55]3 years ago
3 0
I am learning Acts right now, so the answer is:
And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of FAITH and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip, and Prochorus, and Nicanor, and Timon, and Parmenas, and Nicolas a proselyte of Antioch:
You might be interested in
Why did Southern states oppose Hamilton's plan? They were against states' rights. They did not want to have to help pay off othe
timama [110]

Answer:

They did not want to have to help pay off other states' debts.

Explanation:

The Southern states oppose Hamilton's plan because "they did not want to have to help pay off other states' debts."

This is because before Alexander Hamilton makes the proposition, the majority of the southern states had actually paid off their wartime debts using their own money.

Thereby many of them believed other states of the United States should also pay their own debt, without assistance from other states.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is "They did not want to have to help pay off other states' debts."

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Information revolution is considered a true revolution.
andrew-mc [135]
A revolution is a fundamental change in political power and political organization, which occurs relatively quickly when the population revolt against their oppression by the incumbent government.

I believe the answer is True.

The information revolution has enabled many people to actualize their dreams and satisfy their curiosity by learning nearly any concept.

It was really important because it made information way easier to obtain.

It made people way more knowledgeable.

It has led to dramatic reduction in the cost of obtaining, processing, storing, and transmitting information in all forms.



8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The leaders of the US, USSR, and Great Britain said they wanted to cooperate, so why were negotiations at the Yalta and Potsdam
Maksim231197 [3]

Answer:  Each country had its own agenda about the post-war world.

Context/explanation:

Churchill in particular, along with Roosevelt, pushed strongly for Stalin to allow free elections to take place in the nations of Europe after the war. At that time Stalin agreed, but there was a strong feeling by the other leaders that he might renege on that promise. The Soviets never did allow those free elections to occur. Later, Winston Churchill wrote, "Our hopeful assumptions were soon to be falsified." Stalin and the Soviets felt they needed the Eastern European nations as satellites to protect their own interests.   So one key point of disagreement between Stalin and the other two was over the direction things would take in Eastern Europe after the war.

While Winston Churchill and Franklin Delano Roosevelt were on the same page in many ways, there were also key differences between them.   As noted by The Churchill Project of Hillsdale College, "FDR, ever the optimist, believed (or wanted to believe) that Stalin could be convinced that the West was not committed to destruction of the Soviet regime."  Churchill had a much more skeptical view of Stalin and the Soviet Union and approached the relationship in a firmer fashion.  Roosevelt had hoped to continue cooperation with the USSR.  That changed under Truman, who took over the US Presidency after FDR's death.  Truman was strongly anti-communist in his stance.

Another difference between Roosevelt and Churchill pertained to colonialism and imperialism.  Again as noted by The Churchill Project:  "Over colonialism. Roosevelt firmly believed European colonialism had been a major cause of World War I, and that it had continued to be a source of international disputes and tensions before World War II. Churchill had sworn defend the realm, which, when he took office, included the British Empire."  As it happened, after World War II, colonialism's days were numbered and independence movements broke out around the world where imperial powers had dominated.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Marbury vs. Madison decision established the principle of Federal control of interstate commerce. a. True b.False
vova2212 [387]
The answer is false not true
8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
This country is not recognized by everyone in the world as independent.
shutvik [7]

Answer:

Palestine

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which phrases give accurate definitions of history?
    14·1 answer
  • Identify three ways the Nile river helped farmers grow food?thx!
    9·1 answer
  • When you crush an ice cube, you cause a
    7·2 answers
  • The amount of u.S. Exports purchased by the rest of the world is primarily determined by
    6·2 answers
  • What was William Penns main reason for founding Pennsylvania
    8·1 answer
  • Generals Grant and Sherman provided very lenient terms of surrender to the Confederate forces of Lee and Johnston in order to:__
    6·1 answer
  • How did most Minnesotans react to colonel Henry Sibley's court
    9·1 answer
  • The Republican Party was formed in 1854 by...
    9·1 answer
  • Which term BEST describes the British and French policy towards Germany at the Munich Conference of 1938?
    12·1 answer
  • Document A<br> How can you use the map to argue that Alexander was not great?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!