Answer:
The correct answer is a. Her real and nominal salary have risen.
Explanation:
The term nominal salary refers to the salary literally expressed in money; It is the sum of money paid to the worker for the work done during the stipulated day. When referring to the nominal salary we cannot give ourselves a general idea about the level or real value of the salary. The true value of this salary depends entirely on the level of the prices that correspond to the objects of personal consumption, also on the value of the services that are required, as well as the volume of taxes, among other common expenses.
For its part, the real salary refers to the salary expressed with respect to livelihoods and services available to the worker with his salary; Indicates the amount of consumer items that the worker is able to acquire, as well as services that a worker can buy with his nominal salary (which is handled in the monetary amount that the worker receives)
Answer:
The use of the bank's funds for this fundraiser would be justified when the bank's goal is to maximize profit by:
giving the bank public relations boost, thereby improving its public image.
Explanation:
The creation of publicity opportunities through this fundraiser enhances the bank's activities. Awareness of its services is created through the sponsorship. People perceive the bank as a charity-supporting organization, which cares for the welfare of the less-privileged. The fundraiser creates huge goodwill. Public relation is, therefore, critical in helping the bank to engage its diverse publics across various platforms, including the accruing intangible benefits that derivable from the seemingly unprofitable effort.
Answer:
Option (B) is correct.
Explanation:
The utility maximization point for a consumer is as follows:
It is given that,
price of Pepsi(x) = $1 per can
price of a hamburger(y) = $2
Marginal utility from Pepsi = 4
Marginal utility from hamburgers = 6
Hence,
4 > 3
Therefore, it can be seen that the consumer's utility is not maximized at this point.
Law of diminishing marginal utility states that as the consumer consumes more and more quantity of goods then as a result the utility obtained from the consumption goes on diminishing.
So, there is a need to increase the quantity of Pepsi consumed and reducing the quantity of hamburgers consumed.
Nothing really, you just might have a better idea of your budget if you do.
