Answer:
A. -$425.91
Explanation:
Given that
Start up cost = 2700
Cash inflow 1 = 811
Cash inflow 2 = 924
Cash inflow 3 = 638
Cash inflow 4 = 510
Rate = 11.2% or 0.112
Recall that
NPV = E(CF/1 + i]^n) - initial investment or start up cost
Where
E = summation
CF = Cash flow
i = discount rate
n = years
Thus
NPV = -$2,700 + $811 / 1 + 0.112 + $924 / 1 + 0.112^2 + $638 / 1 + 0.112^3 + $510 / 1 + 0.112^4
NPV = -$425.91
Therefore, NPV = -$425.91
Answer: Single
Explanation: Aurora cannot claim her son for the earned income credit because he did not live with her for more than half the year and does not meet the residency test
Answer:
Rochester Corp
Increase
Reedsburg Investments
No effect
Explanation:
Rochester Corp will Increase and Reedsburg Investments will show No effect
Therefore Rochester Corp. should go ahead and use the fair-value method in order to account for its own investment in LaCrosse.
This means the dividend would increase the net income while the Payment of dividends would tend to Increase the investment account on Reedsburg’s balance sheet, but will have or shown no effect on its income statement.
It’s all right . what about you